We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Digital SLR. Buy now or wait til sales?

Hi

I am thinking of buying a DSLR, I am in no rush, but do I wait til the sales after xmas, or is it unlikely that DSLR will have offers on them anyway?

Thanks
«134

Comments

  • DKLS
    DKLS Posts: 13,461 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I picked up a good deal on a Nikon D90 a few weeks back at comet, took an hours haggling and some checking of over online sites for price comparison, but came away with a package deal I was very happy with.
  • isofa
    isofa Posts: 6,091 Forumite
    Cameras and lenses have been going up in price, in general, for the past 12 months, new models will arrive and obviously after a while settle into a lower price bracket (7D is a prime example, high launch price, now much lower "street price"). However a lens I bought 2 years ago for £800 new is now retailing for over £1000!

    I can't see prices dropping much more, plus as Leopard points out, there is the addition 2.5% VAT to take into consideration.

    For the best prices (and to see how they have changed over time) use: www.camerapricebuster.co.uk
  • daveyjp
    daveyjp Posts: 14,140 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Have a look at Amazon, although camerpricebuster does highlight their offers.
  • custardy
    custardy Posts: 38,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    depends if you can wait,i recently went DSLR from my bridge camera
    wish i had done it from when my son was born(2 in feb) as the pictures are miles better
  • Running out of stock to take into consideration too.
  • MX5huggy
    MX5huggy Posts: 7,173 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Nikon are offering cash back, aslong as you buy UK stock it does not matter where you buy

    http://www.europe-nikon.com/news_room/news.html?locale=en_GB&bandwidth=broad&id=2442&type_index=2&universe=[universe:xx]

    There is also a offer of a Free SB900 (£350 flash gun) when you buy a D300s (£1000 camera its an email voucher but if you wanted to take advantage pm me. http://photo.net/nikon-camera-forum/00V6jm
    (if only I had the £1k around to take advantage)

    http://www.camerapricebuster.co.uk/ is a great site for looking at price trends
  • timmmers
    timmmers Posts: 3,757 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    How about finding a place with no VAT, going there, and using up that % as a trip or holiday?

    17.5% of a decent camera plus lenses pays for a good weekend away.

    A weekend in Gib was las time I did this..unsure if that is worth it now though.
    Anywhere with no VAT works though.

    t
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • Leopard
    Leopard Posts: 1,786 Forumite
    custardy wrote: »

    depends if you can wait,i recently went DSLR from my bridge camera
    wish i had done it from when my son was born(2 in feb) as the pictures are miles better


    With respect, that could be pretty dangerously misleading advice, financially, to dispense as a general rule, nowadays.

    You don't give any indication of what make and sophistication of bridge camera it was.

    I understand where you're coming from on this: I had a 2 MP bridge camera some years ago (it was pretty much state of the art, in those days) and, looking back through my photographs now, wish that the digital cameras available inexpensively these days had been available then.

    But things have changed rapidly.

    A modern Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ38 bridge camera takes remarkably good photographs and, for many people, will be more than adequate. It's a lot lighter, a lot less bulky, 12 MP, 18x optical Carl Zeiss zoom and very seriously cheaper than a DSLR.

    Don't laugh at banana republics. :rotfl:

    As a result of how you voted in the last three General Elections,
    you'd now be better off living in one.

  • custardy
    custardy Posts: 38,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 2 December 2009 at 8:46AM
    Leopard wrote: »
    With respect, that could be pretty dangerously misleading advice, financially, to dispense as a general rule, nowadays.

    You don't give any indication of what make and sophistication of bridge camera it was.

    I understand where you're coming from on this: I had a 2 MP bridge camera some years ago (it was pretty much state of the art, in those days) and, looking back through my photographs now, wish that the digital cameras available inexpensively these days had been available then.

    But things have changed rapidly.

    A modern Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ38 bridge camera takes remarkably good photographs and, for many people, will be more than adequate. It's a lot lighter, a lot less bulky, 12 MP, 18x optical Carl Zeiss zoom and very seriously cheaper than a DSLR.

    sorry i should have added,i wasnt just referring to the picture quality but also the speed of the camera
    with kids a difference of a second can mean a lost picture
    DSLR's are not for everyone but the OP is looking to buy one
    the lumix was £300 reviewed,i paid little more than that for my DSLR
  • isofa
    isofa Posts: 6,091 Forumite
    On the note of "bridge" cameras. Many professionals I know are buying the Canon G11 as a secondary travel camera (and I will as soon as it drops in price a bit, it's around £450 at the moment), to save lugging around their DSLRs and lenses. The picture quality is much improved over the G10, especially in low light, since they dropped the resolution to 10MP (just reinforcing that large megapixel resolutions are a complete waste of time on compacts and consumer DSLRs). It has full RAW capture and all the modes and manual overrides of a DSLR, complete with a good zoom lens. In fact I suspect it is capable, even considering the smaller sensor, of taking better quality photos than many consumer level DSLRs in the right hands.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.