We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Utility- Landlord dictating where i must get it from?
Comments
-
Damn I need to find out how to get in on this revenue stream - just think of all the Carribean villas I am missing out on:rolleyes:Seriously though, I think we agree, at least in principle.I have no problem with a tenancy term along the lines of "Ts must apply to the LL in writing for permission to change utility provider; such permission will not be unreasonably withheld by the LL etc" which, if properly exercised, is merely ensuring that the LL is aware of changes to the provider. This saves LL costs at the end of the tenancy. In fact, I use such a term myself. It merely means that I have justification for charging Ts the cost of recovering control of the utilities if Ts have failed to abide by the tenancy agreement.0
-
property.advert wrote: »A tenant can decide to change supplier for many reasons and not only to cut costs. I personally do not think it unreasonable for the landlord to retain some control but perhaps limited to being informed and any penalty to switch out of that deal and into another with a different supplier is taken from the despoit.
There is no justification for taking money from tenant's deposit - LLs simply should not sign up to these deals if the T is paying the bills.That way there will be no "penalty". Simple.0 -
byebyedebt wrote: »....I am a landlord and its a real problem if a tenant changes the supplier and doesn't tell. If you do change, let the landlord know before you go.byebyedebt wrote: »As a landlord I prefer Southern and Utility Warehouse as Southern dont charge sillly bills for the period between lettings (for example a standing charge), where as Utilities Warehouse can also manage the phone services.byebyedebt wrote: »Some landlords charge if you change the service and don't tell them when you move which is reasonable if they have to spend 2hrs ringing the utility companies..byebyedebt wrote: »My own policy is not to forward mail, until I know that utilities are sorted.0
-
My own policy is not to forward mail, until I know that utilities are sorted.
I'm sure you'd expect Tenants not to forward your mail to you then.. what a petty attitude, some might say...0 -
I'd actually go further - the T should not have to apply for "permission" : clause should merely be along lines of "The T is required to notify the LL in writing of any change of utility suppliers".
The problem with this, which in theory I agree with, is that Ts will not do it. The need for "permission" creates a paper trail when a T has informed the LL of their intentions. Otherwise Ts switch (which is fine) and then claim to have informed LLs when they have not. This then degenerates to a "he says she says" argument while the LL has to cover the (admittedly not very high but as you say - every little helps) costs of recovering the utiliities.
Rather than spread this cost over all Ts, the good (who inform, thus removing the costs of finding out who the utilities are now with) and the bad (who do not) I would rather minimise costs for the good Ts and have the bad Ts fully cover the costs associated with their actions.0 -
Well i finally got the LL to agree to let me have free reign on the bills, I printed the uswitch savings page asked him if i could have X discount on my rent then if im not allowed to save it via the utilitys lol
I found out from the CAB, if the bill is in YOUR name the landlord has no rights to tell you that you cant switch but they can demand that you give them notice or tell them what youve switched too0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards