Okay, so turn the Supreme Court ruling against the banks

SurlyBonds

danm wrote: »

or

d) Actually internally agree with you but instead decide to close your account meaning you no longer have a contract.

I doubt it... we had 15 cases where the banks contested by letter that the account would be closed out of spite', but 11 were monthly fee based anyway, and it was ruled that the bank was still capable of earning a fee from them and interest on the money lodged within the account. The other four were retained on the grounds that closing the account is an unfair principle, as the bank has never given notice of such intent prior to, and was therefore trying to close the contract out of pure spite, and was invoking a clause that put the consumer at a disctinct disadvantage. this si also against the Shcedule 2 examples of "restricting a consumer from exercising legal recourse".

The UTCC Regs state that if the contract can continue, in the whole, to be operated, then individual clauses can be removed.

Else, ask the judge to order the bank to simply enforce your equitable terms... that way their terms are still included, as are yours.

You are offering the banks a simple solution, and the court has agreed with us on these cases.

They cannot have it both ways.

SurlyBonds

esmerellda wrote: »

If you can't post directly on here, I've never worked out how to, you can email me [EMAIL="admin@legalbeagles.info"]admin@legalbeagles.info[/EMAIL] . Cheers xx

Ah, I remember the Learned Hounds site

natweststaffmember

SurlyBonds wrote: »

Ah, I remember the Learned Hounds site

And some of us STILL remember you
I won't go through the numerous names I have on the sites but shortened version is nattie(or nattY on pc). I thought it was you when I saw that name. Ain't no one who doesn't remember SurlyBonds....but surely you don't need a welcome??
A warm frosty welcome to ya nonetheless

esmerellda

Indeedy xxx

SurlyBonds

natweststaffmember wrote: »

And some of us STILL remember you
I won't go through the numerous names I have on the sites but shortened version is nattie(or nattY on pc). I thought it was you when I saw that name. Ain't no one who doesn't remember SurlyBonds....but surely you don't need a welcome??
A warm frosty welcome to ya nonetheless

I am well used to frosty!

I'm not going to be on here full-time... just on for a few days trying to rally the troops to NOT give up... this is only the first round of the serrious bit of the war.

pingchris

although i didnt quite understand all the legal jargon of your post surly,i kinda understand where your coming from,thanks for the post and i echo a welcome.;)