We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

British Shoeboxes Aren't Big Enough for a Jolly Good Xmas

13468911

Comments

  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 24 November 2009 at 11:47PM
    Reading some of the room sizes on here I wonder what size my house (in number of rooms) would be if it was an older house.

    I presume a 4 bed 1920's house?

    Living room 21' X 13', Kitchen 11' X 10', Breakfast 12' X 10', Dining (now play room ) 10' 6" X 8' 6", Study 8' X 7'. hall 18' X 10' maximum (odd shape).

    I must admit ours is the only new build I saw wit 2X 4' X 4' cloak rooms (storage not WC's:)) and a 5' X 4' under stairs storage.

    I really do not think I could have got a bigger house for my money but I should imagine I could of got a bigger over all plot if I got an older house.
  • puddy
    puddy Posts: 12,709 Forumite
    edited 24 November 2009 at 11:46PM
    blimey PN, that is actually quite shocking, i dont think of you that way

    underfloor heating, too expensive and i was told its more of secondary heating rather than main heating, especially for those on here with seemingly HUGE houses, unlike me
  • NEH
    NEH Posts: 2,464 Forumite
    There is a down side to large rooms though.
    We live in an 1800s house and the reception rooms are nearly 6mts x 6mts as are the main bedrooms and the hall is nearly 30 ft long.We have a lovely sized kitchen 19 x15 ft but the down side is no matter how much we spend on heating,in the winter the place is always bloody freezing.

    30ft long, my word what do you do dance The Gay Gordons down the hallway...:rotfl:
    I'll use this thread to slip in the little known fact that I did, once, years ago, randomly have a quickie in the built in cupboard in a new build :)

    While the sales lady was downstairs at her desk.


    Thanks, i feel better for knowing that information ;):rotfl: is that your confession of the week? feel better now? :p
  • PasturesNew
    PasturesNew Posts: 70,698 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Really2 wrote: »
    Reading some of the room sizes on here I wonder what size my house (in number of rooms) would be if it was an older house.

    I presume a 4 bed 1920's house?

    Living room 21' X 13', Kitchen 11' X 10', Breakfast 12' X 10', Dining (now play room ) 10' 6" X 8' 6", Study 8' X 7'. hall 18' X 10' maximum (odd shape).

    I must admit ours is the only new build I saw wit 2X 4' X 4' cloak rooms (storage not WC's:)) and a 5' X 4' under stairs storage.

    I really do not think I could have got a bigger house for my money but I should imagine I could of got a bigger over all plot if I got an older house.
    If a developer got hold of that it'd be four 1-bed flats and two studios!
    Easily.

    I could dig through rightmove and find actual self-contained studios, a total of 12'x12' for £70-100k in some places (nowhere near London either)

    Developers really do take the pee.
  • NEH
    NEH Posts: 2,464 Forumite
    If a developer got hold of that it'd be four 1-bed flats and two studios!
    Easily.

    I could dig through rightmove and find actual self-contained studios, a total of 12'x12' for £70-100k in some places (nowhere near London either)

    Developers really do take the pee.

    Studio flats nr where we used to live in Aberdeen go for 91K when they've been renovated.
  • That's a bit of a monster size isn't it.

    It is quite a big house - we've been in it a long time. When we moved the kids were - 11,12 & 13. The mother in law couldn't manage the stairs - so a downstairs room - the study was used as a bedroom for her visits for a number of years. A bedroom each for the kids and a spare for other relatives visiting - we live at one end of the country and the rest of the family live at the other end.

    The downside is now that we are looking to move everything new seems pokey - we thought a new house would be the way forward - lack of maintenance etc.

    TBH, when we moved into it - it seemed huge for a while - it's about twice the size of the house before it. The downside is the cost to carpet it and decorate it.
  • treliac
    treliac Posts: 4,524 Forumite
    I'll use this thread to slip in the little known fact that I did, once, years ago, randomly have a quickie in the built in cupboard in a new build :)

    Was that with someone else? ;)
  • This discussion is about houses, not mansions :P

    That is huuuge.. your kitchen is about 10% larger than my entire current living space.

    Thing is I sold my new build with a total down stairs living area not as big as one of the reception rooms we have now and paid 10k more for this one.
    It has four beds and the smallest two are 12ft x9ft with two landings measuring 15ft x9ft and a downstairs lobby 6ft x5ft.
    We had to redecorate throughout but it was the best thing we ever did, and it's in a nice area.
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I could dig through rightmove and find actual self-contained studios, a total of 12'x12' for £70-100k in some places (nowhere near London either)

    Developers really do take the pee.

    That does take the pee.

    Here could be an MSN challenge I wonder what is the optimum size house, £ per sq ft.

    So where do house hit optimal performance for the £, I presume there must be a point.

    I would have a guess at 3 bed ex council.:)
  • NEH
    NEH Posts: 2,464 Forumite
    It is quite a big house - we've been in it a long time. When we moved the kids were - 11,12 & 13. The mother in law couldn't manage the stairs - so a downstairs room - the study was used as a bedroom for her visits for a number of years. A bedroom each for the kids and a spare for other relatives visiting - we live at one end of the country and the rest of the family live at the other end.

    The downside is now that we are looking to move everything new seems pokey - we thought a new house would be the way forward - lack of maintenance etc.

    TBH, when we moved into it - it seemed huge for a while - it's about twice the size of the house before it. The downside is the cost to carpet it and decorate it.


    You can tell I am tired, I read that as your family lived at one end of the house and you at the other...:rotfl:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.