We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Winter fuel allowance

12467

Comments

  • carolt
    carolt Posts: 8,531 Forumite
    Not as clear cut I suppose but it should probably be the same for them, unless theres a scenario where you could be renting a band H property and not be able to move to a band A/B property that was cheaper that I'm not thinking of.

    But your argument for this was that they were 'sitting on a half million pound of assets'.

    Not if they rent, they're not. (Well, they may be sitting on it, but it belongs to someone else. :rolleyes:)
  • carolt wrote: »
    But your argument for this was that they were 'sitting on a half million pound of assets'.

    Not if they rent, they're not. (Well, they may be sitting on it, but it belongs to someone else. :rolleyes:)

    Well the point is, they can afford to pay the associated costs of living in a larger property so don't need handouts to get by. Obviously somebody who owns a half million pound property is likely to be financially better off than somebody who rents one, but the principle applies to both - they can both move somewhere cheaper to own/maintain if they need to.
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    kennyboy66 wrote: »
    The most sensible idea would be to roll it in to the state pension and if necessary up the age related personal allowances a bit - as these are clawed back after a certain point it has the advantage that higher rate tax paying pensioners would then pay tax on this money.

    It would cost miles less to administer / advertise etc etc.

    If you can't budget at the age of 65, you are beyond hope.

    I'd make child benefit taxable (or scrap it, or perhaps have a child tax allowance that can be claimed) and certainly scrap the daft child trust fund thingymajig.

    Of course the downside is that it reduces the feeling of largesse that politicians enjoy.

    If you give a pensioner who is getting some council benefit £5 a week most of it would come off their benefit
  • carolt
    carolt Posts: 8,531 Forumite
    Well the point is, they can afford to pay the associated costs of living in a larger property so don't need handouts to get by. Obviously somebody who owns a half million pound property is likely to be financially better off than somebody who rents one, but the principle applies to both - they can both move somewhere cheaper to own/maintain if they need to.

    Not the same all. One has huge assets, which they could sell to pay for heating, one doesn't. I would have thought that was blatantly obvious.
  • PasturesNew
    PasturesNew Posts: 70,698 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    In which case your house price has almost certainly gone up substantially too. It's hard to justify spending limited public resources in the form of welfare benefits on somebody sat in half a millions pounds worth (or more) of assets. There's always equity release if all else fails.
    I said you're sat in your council house. Not that one owns it.
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 20 November 2009 at 12:10AM
    alared wrote: »
    All I can say is when the fuel allowance is paid,probably next week, the supermarket trollies will be full of booze.

    I thought is was dependent on outside temperature, it is warm at the moment :confused:
    I checked it and it appears to be flat rate, I sure they get something dependent on temperature.
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • bryanb
    bryanb Posts: 5,034 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 20 November 2009 at 4:08AM
    StevieJ wrote: »
    I thought is was dependent on outside temperature, it is warm at the moment :confused:
    I checked it and it appears to be flat rate, I sure they get something dependent on temperature.


    That's the Cold weather payment, different thing.
    Not all get that, over 75s I think.
    There are also 2 rates of Winter fuel payment, £250 under 80, I think £400 above 80 but I haven't reached that yet I'll let you know in 2022
    I know I'm up late (Keeping an eye on the thermostat)
    This is an open forum, anyone can post and I just did !
  • The trouble with living under a labour government is that they tax you to the hilt only to give it back to you. This makes no sense though because the administration involved means we lose out, why not just leave us with the money in the first place?
  • alared
    alared Posts: 4,029 Forumite
    The trouble with living under a labour government is that they tax you to the hilt only to give it back to you

    and every other tom,!!!!!! and harry
  • zygurat789
    zygurat789 Posts: 4,263 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by alared viewpost.gif
    All those who don`t want heating allowance needn`t claim it.

    If anything should be means tested (although I`m not in favour of means testing) it should be child benefit.


    tanith wrote: »
    If you are getting a State Pension or certain other benefits you don't have to claim its automatically sent to the same bank account...

    BEWARE NOT TRUE You do have to claim it initially thereafter it is paid automatically presumeably on the grounds you are not getting any younger.
    The only thing that is constant is change.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.