📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Unenforceability & Template Letters II

Options
1211212214216217252

Comments

  • 10past6
    10past6 Posts: 4,962 Forumite
    I thought (hoped) you'd pick up on that point mate
    I'm thinking more along the lines of rescission of contract ;) which in turn would make the CCJ unlawful, we just need confirmation how Cohen became involved ;)
    Click here for Martins (MSE) advice on who to contact with Debt Issues - YOU HAVE NO REASON TO USE A FEE PAYING DEBT MANAGEMENT COMPANY- THEY CANNOT DO ANYMORE FOR YOU THAN THOSE LISTED IN MY LINK ABOVE.

    All information given by myself is offered informally and without prejudice - if in doubt seek help from a qualified and insured professional
  • 10past6 wrote: »
    I'm thinking more along the lines of rescission of contract ;) which in turn would make the CCJ unlawful, we just need confirmation how Cohen became involved ;)


    Ooooohhhh yea....... i'd never have even thought of that - very sneaky ;);)
    :o 2010 - year of the troll :o

    Niddy - Over & Out :wave:
  • 10past6 wrote: »
    How did Cohen become involved in this debt? in other words, what prompted you to start paying them back in 2008?

    I think Howard Cohen are the solicitors on behalf of CL Finance. When I spoke to the Northampton court they stated that it was regarding an HSBC CC, CL Finance however appear to have taken over the debt from HSBC. The application was lodged by Howard Cohen and Co. The court gave me HCC contact details. My Equifax CR shows CL Finance as the owner of the debt and no HSBC. So I'm do't really know how HCC got involved. The threat from the call was enough to scare me so I just stated that I could only afford between £10 and £20 per month. Since the 2008 call from HCC I have never received anything in writing from them apart from the call I made to them last week.
  • ejc81
    ejc81 Posts: 225 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Hiya
    Ok, now you've explained it you should be able to get it removed. I'd first off send the DCA (1st credit) a strong letter advising what you've just told us above - demanding removal of default - also enclose another copy of proof of payment/settlement letter.

    Only problem now is I may have disposed of the paperwork *searching now* and I never actually had anything from Capquest to say I had settled, just the letter offering a settlement. Hopefully all this stuff is somewhere on my pc so off to hunt for it now.
    If you want to give me specifics (such as dates and exact amounts and default date etc) I will do you a letter later tonight or tomorrow night when I have more time?

    Just let me know......

    Cheers mate you are a total star :T
  • ejc81 wrote: »
    Only problem now is I may have disposed of the paperwork *searching now* and I never actually had anything from Capquest to say I had settled, just the letter offering a settlement. Hopefully all this stuff is somewhere on my pc so off to hunt for it now.

    Afterthought - we could always SAR CapQuest to get a copy of the letter they sent you, so don't worry if you've binned it. :D

    Just let me know what you want to do and whether you can find anything, if you can then we'll start on 1st Credit - otherwise it means SARing CapQuest and waiting a few weeks til they respond.
    :o 2010 - year of the troll :o

    Niddy - Over & Out :wave:
  • 10past6 wrote: »
    I'm thinking more along the lines of rescission of contract ;) which in turn would make the CCJ unlawful, we just need confirmation how Cohen became involved ;)

    Just thinking aloud mate, wouldn't Long v Lloyd {1958}(1 WLR 753) come into play, i.e. a judge could (if they wanted) decline Recission based on, for example it not being 'good cause'?

    Sorry, don't mean to confuse matters - just had a lightbulb moment (arghhh, dangerous!) :eek:
    :o 2010 - year of the troll :o

    Niddy - Over & Out :wave:
  • 10past6
    10past6 Posts: 4,962 Forumite
    Afroking wrote: »
    I think Howard Cohen are the solicitors on behalf of CL Finance.
    They have a lot of history and are well known within the debt / litigation system, we'll say no more on that at this stage, judge for yourself ;)

    OK, we need a paper trail here to find out who has been involved and at what stage, once you obtain the correspondence back, only then can we know what action to take, if it means asking for the CCJ to be set aside, we need the correct reasons, which is why an SAR is required.

    You can use the following to request your SAR:
    Data Protection Act 1998 Subject Access Request


    Dear Sir/Madam

    Account number: xxxxxxxx


    Please send me the information which I am entitled to under section 7(1) of the Data Protection Act 1998 in relation to detailed occurrences relating to the account Numbers xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx-x

    The following is by no means an exhaustive list but in the main this is what I require.

    Please supply me with a complete list of transactions and charges relating to ALL accounting history with your organisation.

    Additionally, all records you hold on me relevant to the above accounts, including but not limited to:

    1. A transcript of all transactions, including charges, fees, interest, repayments and payments and both the original amount of the loan and any repayments made to the account.

    2. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations by your company

    3. Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my account. If you are unable to supply this data because there has been no such manual intervention, then please be so kind as to confirm this in your response

    4. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notices that you may have sent to me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

    5. Documents relating to any insurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted.

    6. Details of any collection charge added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

    7. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of these accounts and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

    8. A genuine copy of any deed of assignment, or proof that you have a legal right to this money.

    9. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

    10. A list of third party agencies to whom you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

    11. A copy of all account statements for the duration of the agreement.

    12. Please would you also advise me of the logic involved in any automated decisions taken by you about me pursuant to section 7(1) (d) of the Data Protection Act 1998.

    13. A True copy of the consumer credit agreement section 77-79 of the Consumer Credit Act of 1974.

    Any other information relating to the account.

    I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply. Furthermore, if I discover that you have levied disproportionate penalties against me, I shall be reclaiming them, and reclaiming the enclosed £10 Data Protection Act subject access request fee.

    Click here for Martins (MSE) advice on who to contact with Debt Issues - YOU HAVE NO REASON TO USE A FEE PAYING DEBT MANAGEMENT COMPANY- THEY CANNOT DO ANYMORE FOR YOU THAN THOSE LISTED IN MY LINK ABOVE.

    All information given by myself is offered informally and without prejudice - if in doubt seek help from a qualified and insured professional
  • 10past6
    10past6 Posts: 4,962 Forumite
    Sorry, don't mean to confuse matters - just had a lightbulb moment (arghhh, dangerous!) :eek:
    That's OK ;) but a paper trail would be more advantageous, that way the court must rule in his favour if anyone has steped outside the required procedure
    Click here for Martins (MSE) advice on who to contact with Debt Issues - YOU HAVE NO REASON TO USE A FEE PAYING DEBT MANAGEMENT COMPANY- THEY CANNOT DO ANYMORE FOR YOU THAN THOSE LISTED IN MY LINK ABOVE.

    All information given by myself is offered informally and without prejudice - if in doubt seek help from a qualified and insured professional
  • Thank you very much 10past6 and never-in-doubt. I'll be back once I've got the advise.
  • Ok, well hold fire for 10past6 and see what he says but he will tell you to SAR Howard Cohen, that's what i'd do! lol.
    10past6 wrote: »
    which is why an SAR is required.

    Hahaha - I knew it :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:
    :o 2010 - year of the troll :o

    Niddy - Over & Out :wave:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.