We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
anyone know an update to the test case
momo1975
Posts: 161 Forumite
Anyone know what is happening i thought that we would have a resolution this month?
thanks
thanks
0
Comments
-
Which test case? There are several going on depending on what area you are complaining about.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
-
the bank charges ones0
-
the bank charges ones
Currently the Supreme Court(used to House of Lords) are considering whether the bank charges terms are assessable for fairness. If they decide that they are then the next stage is further court litigation which will decide on the fairness of charges, refunds etc, etc,.
The Appeal the banks made to the House of Lords, win lose or draw will not bring an immediate refund of charges and I would say we are almost at the half way mark.0 -
Hi, thanks for that
i thought that this was happening in Oct 2009? or am i wring in saying this?natweststaffmember wrote: »Currently the Supreme Court(used to House of Lords) are considering whether the bank charges terms are assessable for fairness. If they decide that they are then the next stage is further court litigation which will decide on the fairness of charges, refunds etc, etc,.
The Appeal the banks made to the House of Lords, win lose or draw will not bring an immediate refund of charges and I would say we are almost at the half way mark.0 -
We were expecting that it might happen in October 2009 because the House of Lords didn't decide the case by July so October was the earliest date. I suspect middle of November(but it is a pure guess on my part and not based on any other reason).Hi, thanks for that
i thought that this was happening in Oct 2009? or am i wring in saying this?0 -
im hoping that its dotting the i,s and crossing the t,s as far as bank charge refunds are concerned,they better hurry up though as im sensing a great discontent with banks the f,o,s and the house of lords from all quarters regarding this,they siad october for a decision and its the 28th october now so what are they playing at,one big runaround sending people crazy is not the way to bring this to an end,mr banker its time for a swift decision,ie now...........................:money:missed direct debit charges,very odd,theres no pain so how come the big gain,i.e £39.00 for a letter0
-
This decision we are awaiting is nothing to do with refunds so if you have your hopes up high then you will be disappointed. The likely date for a decision is November 19th so keep that date in mind.im hoping that its dotting the i,s and crossing the t,s as far as bank charge refunds are concerned,they better hurry up though as im sensing a great discontent with banks the f,o,s and the house of lords from all quarters regarding this,they siad october for a decision and its the 28th october now so what are they playing at,one big runaround sending people crazy is not the way to bring this to an end,mr banker its time for a swift decision,ie now...........................:money:0 -
what is the decision then to be made on the 19th november,surely refunds should be getting sorted soon,this is getting insane,in fact its becoming quite childish of the banks,and to be honest,insulting to my intelligence if they think i for one dont know the pathetic juvinile game they are playing.:money::money:missed direct debit charges,very odd,theres no pain so how come the big gain,i.e £39.00 for a letter0
-
They aren't deciding if the terms are fair or unfair so the answer is that until we have more litigation then refunds are not on the table. Everything depends at the moment on whether the terms are assessable for fairness under UTCCR 1999.what is the decision then to be made on the 19th november,surely refunds should be getting sorted soon,this is getting insane,in fact its becoming quite childish of the banks,and to be honest,insulting to my intelligence if they think i for one dont know the pathetic juvinile game they are playing.:money::money:0 -
im hoping that its dotting the i,s and crossing the t,s as far as bank charge refunds are concerned,they better hurry up though as im sensing a great discontent with banks the f,o,s and the house of lords from all quarters regarding this,they siad october for a decision and its the 28th october now so what are they playing at:money:
Who are ''they'' ?
If you're referring to the Supreme Court, 'they' didn't say October or indeed give any indication whatsoever as to when judgment was expected to be handed down. October was only ever an assumption by the media and forums.
According to the Listings Office at the Supreme Court Lord Phillips is nearing completion writing his judgment and Thursday 19 November ''may be a suitable date'' to schedule the handing down.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards