Advice on misleading original prices in Laura Ashley sale

pulliptears

dmg24 wrote: »

Remember that the label would have been for the store - there is nothing to stop a retailer charging differently in this way (although it is more usual for the store price to be more). Alternatively, it could be that the label is for the new 'full price', once all the sales are over - this is allowed. What would not be allowed was if the £175 price was never charged prior to the reductions.

Perhaps, and as I recall OP was told it was 'old stock'. Still, on the face of it I can understand her annoyance even though they are acting within the law.
I think I'd snatch their hands off at an offer of £20 refund though

globalds

And there goes another satisfied customer ................

makapo

Rippins wrote: »

I don't think online bullying can ever be excused regardless of what you think of the question posted. Again, I am sure this is not what Martin intended.

You haven't been bullied, you've been disagreed with.

Actually, it's questionable whether there's any such thing as "online bullying", since it's always easy to leave.

globalds

makapo wrote: »

You haven't been bullied, you've been disagreed with.

Actually, it's questionable whether there's any such thing as "online bullying", since it's always easy to leave.

The perception of bullying is subjective ...And why should a new member have to leave as a response ....Sounds like a bully speaking to me ..

makapo

globalds wrote: »

The perception of bullying is subjective ...And why should a new member have to leave as a response ....Sounds like a bully speaking to me ..

Ha ha ha!!! I have you in my power!!! I'm going to stick your head down the toilet and if you squeal I'll pull the eyes out of your teddy bear!!!