We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
PPI claims company - sting in the tail!!
grahamradioman
Posts: 1 Newbie
My son instructed a company to recover his ppi charges in early april 2009 and was made redundant out of the blue in late may.He had to draw on the ppi (which took 2 months and much jumping through hoops to get paid).He immediatly informed the company but as over 2 weeks had gone by from the start of his intruction they said it counted as a cancellation and have sent him a bill for £500 plus £75 vat.He is dylexic and has other health problems and although ignorance of terms and conditions is no excuse I believe that a fixed sum like this for who knows what work has been done is exccessive.I am going to appeal to their good nature on his behalf but i wont hold my breath. In contact with them to date they said" I recommend that once you start a claim, you need to be committed to cancelling your policy. If you started a claim with us, and your situation changed in which you then wanted to claim on your policy - our cancellation fee of £500 would have to be upheld." My son did not want to draw on his policy he HAD to draw on his policy to keep his house.So please people take care as these companies can apply charges that are as obscure as the banks and loan companies that they like to show as charging over the top charges
0
Comments
-
Once again people - DO NOT USE CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES.0
-
YKES!! That really is hard going .... Have you tried going back to them and either:
a) pointing out that The Court of Appeal in HOWARD MARINE AND DREDGING CO. LTD. v. A. OGDEN & SONS (EXCAVATIONS) LTD. [1975 H. No. 4557], establishes that a clause in a contract which states that a signature indicates full acceptance is not valid where it would be unlikely that the customer would have the skill and inclination to go through the fine detail. And so your son's health conditions should be taken into account (might work) or:
b)complaining to the MOJ claims management http://www.claimsregulation.gov.uk/search.aspx about the excessive fee there is a complaints procedure here: http://www.claimsregulation.gov.uk/__wysiwyg/UploadedFiles/File/MoJ%20Final%20Complaints%20leaflet%20A4.pdf:AIgnorance can be cured, but stupid is forever!:A
Please note: Nothing that I post constitutes professional financial or legal advice.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards