We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

N&P to charge fraud VICTIMS £50 - anyone else?

2»

Comments

  • oldfella wrote: »
    If you HAVE failed to maintain it, you'll be fully liable for all losses.
    the point I was trying to make was the wording is extremely loose - as it stands if you get a trojan or any nasty then you have failed to keep your computer secure

    if your firewall or anti-virus fails your have failed to keep your computer secure

    T&Cs like this are written to make life easy for the banks and BSs - they should be avoided.
    In truth, you're correct: "if you get a trojan or any nasty then you have failed to keep your computer secure" (that's not to say you haven't attempted to keep your computer secure, but your attempts clearly failed!)

    However, I really doubt these Ts & Cs are designed to catch you out - I think you're reading the wording too literally. The thing is, the vast majority of people aren't security experts, they're not trained and the most they can reasonably be expected to do is follow best practice guidelines; the sort all banks put on their FAQ pages
    • install a firewall and antivirus
    • keep them and your operating system/software patched and up to date
    • use common sense and don't open/reply to suspicious emails (using the same criteria you'd use to decide if a door caller was suspicious)
    • use strong, non-dictionary passwords, keep them unique and change them regularly
    Did you know that if an employee launches an attack from with his company, the managing director, or a more specifically-appointed security director, is personally and legally liable? That was introduced when companies were putting undue responsibility on their IT managers, who weren't trained in network security - the courts ruled it unrealistic to expect someone to know the ins and outs of security without being adequately trained and it made the Boards sit up and pay for adequate security to be implemented.

    I think the majority of people would be able to claim they took precautions to the best of their knowledge, no matter how basic. I think the argument would come down to whether they were unduly careless, based on the general advice given above and stated on most e-commerce and e-banking sites.
    You've never seen me, but I've been here all along - watching and learning...:cool:
  • evenasus
    evenasus Posts: 11,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Talking about being careful with security details...

    The number of people I see in front of me, entering their pin number into shop card readers for all to see. Not trying to hide their number what so ever.:eek: It never ceases to amaze me.
  • yes, some people will always think it's only going to happen to someone else. Personally, I don't believe in luck.
    You've never seen me, but I've been here all along - watching and learning...:cool:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.