We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
For the owld gits....
Options
Comments
-
Just thought it might be worth mentioning that Birmingham Midshires are the provider for Saga products.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0
-
Thanks for that, there's some real food for thought there. I was hoping someone might pull a 4% one-year package out of a hat somewhere but, hey, there's probably more chance of me becoming the next Chancellor:rotfl:
Am I right then in assuming it would be better to take out a Birmingham Mid five-year bond at 5.1% and close it after one year if needs be and I'm still guaranteed to achieve slightly better than the 3.75% at Saga even after the 90-day penalty? And if things haven't eased it can sit there at 5.1% until they do. It sounds like win-win in taking out a five year bond with only 90 days penalty.
I just subscribed to this on the 1st Oct (it's actually 5.15%) I favoured it over other 2 year bonds as you say you can cash it in for a 90 day penalty, it's very likley that I will just let it mature but I like the option of gettting out before 3 years have elapsed and still beating the current 2 year bonds available.Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
It may be worth looking on part at some of the structured products. Whilst I am generally not a fan of these, you do normally get some good income ones after a market crash. 7% is possible at the moment. For some of the money, that may make a difference and make the small element of risk worthwhile.
Anyone considering structured products should be very careful of the counterparty risks, which are NOT covered by FSCS.
http://www.ifaonline.co.uk/professional-adviser/news/1533975/investors-wait-pay-fees-lehman-struc-prod-compensationIn case you hadn't already worked it out - the entire global financial system is predicated on the assumption that you're an idiot:cool:0 -
Anyone considering structured products should be very careful of the counterparty risks, which are NOT covered by FSCS.
http://www.ifaonline.co.uk/professional-adviser/news/1533975/investors-wait-pay-fees-lehman-struc-prod-compensation
It certainly needs to be considered but many of the structured plans available now have better gradings at counterparty risk. On many, Barclays have taken on the liability for example.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards