We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
my mortgage is so large, i will never be mortgage free
Comments
-
The_White_Horse wrote: »the price of houses were getting out of control, and the left wing govt should have allowed interest rates to rise, but they deliberately kept them low so people could feel rich and mew to their hearts content.
And if you are lucky enough to have known this was what was happening (the majority had no idea it seems) why did you go ahead and buy?
I knew the system was out of kilter with people's salaries so kept looking for two years until I found a property being sold by people that didn't have their heads in the sand....now I just have to put up with the comments from my neighbour who paid £50k more then I did.0 -
People will always want to buy their own home - this desire is deeply ingrained in our national psyche. And they will do whatever they need in order to do this.
So if financial institutions are [were] prepared to lend 8-9-10x peoples' annual income over 30 years or more, then people will take these products out to achieve their dream.
As more and more people did this, so others had to follow - effectively, they had no choice if they were to successfully compete with other house-buyers.
In my view, this is a key reason why the market was able to overheat. If people hadn't been able to access these levels of borrowing from the financial institutions, prices simply could not have risen in the way they did.
I don't have a particular political axe to grind, but it would have been logical for the government to have implemented some sort of regulatory control on lending to reduce the chances of a boom - followed by a bust.
It's hard to imagine such an overheating being able to happen had people been limited to multipliers of 3.5X their annual income. It would have put the onus on encouraging people to build up greater levels of saving to achieve their ambitions instead...
QB0 -
It was Margaret Thatcher and the Tory governemnt that sold off council homes and forced home-ownership on the masses. Labour failed to reverse the damage but had they tried, would have been unelectable.
That's the problem with our democratic system that we try to force on the rest of the world. People vote for the crowd pleasers.
GGThere are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those that don't.0 -
I think people who bought post 1997 should start paying a true and proper interest rate and shouldn`t expect to be "cushioned" by savers who are getting derisory rates.
I bought pre 1997 and was paying 15%, maybe a taste of that would stop today`s whingers.
Same here bought 1991 , interest rate was 16%:eek:
My parents in law bought in 1965 , house cost them around £2k , they saved like mad together the few hundred pounds deposit and struggled for years to pay their mortgage , they had 2nd hand furniture no carpets no heating no holidays , they werent unusual , it was the norm . Nowadays ( god i sound like my parents :rotfl:) it appears that everyone thinks its their right to have everythingVuja De - the feeling you'll be here later0 -
i would rather pay 15% on 90k than 5% on 290k.0
-
Thinks the OP has read too many academic books and talks aload of toff
:P
Just my opinion and yes I have a morgage from 4 years ago , so I pay it , I took it out and if I cant afford it I get a second jobONE HOUSE , DS+ DD Missymoo Living a day at a time and getting through this mess you have created.One day life will have no choice but to be nice to me :rotfl:0 -
Same here bought 1991 , interest rate was 16%:eek:
My parents in law bought in 1965 , house cost them around £2k , they saved like mad together the few hundred pounds deposit and struggled for years to pay their mortgage , they had 2nd hand furniture no carpets no heating no holidays , they werent unusual , it was the norm . Nowadays ( god i sound like my parents :rotfl:) it appears that everyone thinks its their right to have everything
You`ve hit the nail right on the head there.
Live now pay later or better still go bankrupt for a year.
No need to wonder how we got into the mess we`re now in.0 -
The_White_Horse wrote: »i would rather pay 15% on 90k than 5% on 290k.
Do you whinge and moan about everything, or is it just housing?0 -
Stop moaning and downsize if you are finding your mortgage too high?Mortgage Start jun 2007 £88500 Outstanding Balance £51000
Overpayments 2007 Nil 2008 £1040 2009 £7853 2010 £10000 2011 aiming for £18000 (6k so far)
The Early Bird Gets the Worm, but the Second Mouse Gets the Cheese!!0 -
Assume when you took the mortgage out, you agreed to repay over a set number of years? So, technically, you will be mortgage free in the future.
At the end of the day, if you don't like having such a large mortgage, sell the property and either
a) buy something smaller
b) rent
Oh, and c) stop moaning about itIt's wouldn't have not wouldn't of, shouldn't have not shouldn't of and couldn't have not couldn't of. Geddit?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards