We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Strange offers and prices on repo
Options

dh_mcr
Posts: 39 Forumite
I spotted a repo house on rightmove a few weeks ago. It was Sold STC but has now become available again:
30 September: Status changed from Sold STC to Available
20 July: Price changed from Offers in excess of £79, 950 to Offers in excess of £72, 000.
Status changed from Available to Sold STC.
09 June: Price Changed from: £89, 950 to Offers in excess of £79,950
21 May: Initial entry found
The agent's own website is already reporting an offer of £68, 000 although the house was only readvertised this morning.
So, my questions are:
1. The asking price was reduced on the 20th July, the same date as the status changed. I'm therefore assuming that the offer was below 72, 000. But this puts it way below the asking price of 79, 950.
I thought the sellers of repo's want to get as much money as possible, so why are they accepting such a drop after 2 months?
2. If the status changed to Sold STC on the 20 July, how come it's only just fallen through.
3. Where could this brand new offer of £68, 000 have come from considering the house was only changed to available this morning? If it was a previously rejected offer why wasn't it chosen sooner?
30 September: Status changed from Sold STC to Available
20 July: Price changed from Offers in excess of £79, 950 to Offers in excess of £72, 000.
Status changed from Available to Sold STC.
09 June: Price Changed from: £89, 950 to Offers in excess of £79,950
21 May: Initial entry found
The agent's own website is already reporting an offer of £68, 000 although the house was only readvertised this morning.
So, my questions are:
1. The asking price was reduced on the 20th July, the same date as the status changed. I'm therefore assuming that the offer was below 72, 000. But this puts it way below the asking price of 79, 950.
I thought the sellers of repo's want to get as much money as possible, so why are they accepting such a drop after 2 months?
2. If the status changed to Sold STC on the 20 July, how come it's only just fallen through.
3. Where could this brand new offer of £68, 000 have come from considering the house was only changed to available this morning? If it was a previously rejected offer why wasn't it chosen sooner?
0
Comments
-
who knows who put the offer in, friend of a friend maybe, but the estate agents legally have to advertise that an offer has been put in and any offers over the £68k will have to be considered before exchange.Food and Smellies Shop target £50 pw - managed average of £49 per week in 2013 down to £38.90 per week in 20160
-
I thought the sellers of repo's want to get as much money as possible, so why are they accepting such a drop after 2 months?
The banks main concern is to get back what they are owed - if the offer was enough to cover that then they aren't going to hang on longer than necessary for more, as the extra wouldnt go to them anyhow, but to the people who were repossessed.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.4K Spending & Discounts
- 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards