We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Dry cleaning disaster
andylong42
Posts: 106 Forumite
My wife has (had) a lovely £120.00 dress that has been dry cleaned by a local independent dry cleaner 3 or 4 times in the past. I was in a hurry to get it cleaned before a christening and had to take it to Johnsons inside an Asda store. The dress has mother of pearl beads on the front and the cleaner (sorry "cleanologist" as they like to be called) told me the process could damage the mother of pearl. They asked me to sign a disclaimer, which I did as I have never had problems in the past.
I went to collect the dress only to be told that there had been a problem. The material has been ruined and marked in several places and the dress is now unwearable. The mother of pearl is fine, however I am worried that they will claim the disclaimer will cover them for ANY problems. They are sending the dress off to be examined, but I am not prepared to accept anything less than compensation for a replacement dress.
Can anyone advise?
I went to collect the dress only to be told that there had been a problem. The material has been ruined and marked in several places and the dress is now unwearable. The mother of pearl is fine, however I am worried that they will claim the disclaimer will cover them for ANY problems. They are sending the dress off to be examined, but I am not prepared to accept anything less than compensation for a replacement dress.
Can anyone advise?
0
Comments
-
If their examination comes back to say it was dry cleaned as per instructions, so they won't pay out, then get an independent examination of the dress, and point out that it has been dry cleaned MANY times before without any issues.Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
