We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Order of Sale enforcement
Comments
-
Really if you leave children behind, should you really be making more children really should you. You've proved you can't support one family, why should you go on and have more.
Really??
My husband walked out because he didn't love his ex wife anymore, should he have gone for the snip then:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
He supports ALL his children so as long as he can do that he can have as many babies as he likes with whom he likes:eek:;):p:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:0 -
Dancing_Shoes wrote: »That is a very bold statement to make!
Of course none of us really know the full story with regards to what people post but they would have to be pretty weird people if they came on here and posted phoney stories....:rolleyes:
Sorry I did not mean to "thank you" I was meant to click on "Quote"
My friend's ex is posting on this forum begging for help when in fact he is totally non-compliant and has been so for the past 8 years!
And so is my ex!
Also, if one read carefully some of the posters threads one will realise that the story keep changing!
I must admit that it brings such a big smile on my face when a non-compliant NRP use the forum as a way of getting help for it shows that they are reaching a point when it is becoming extremely difficult for them to get away from their responsabilities.
:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:0 -
Now I'm done posting on this thread!0
-
"Thank You" Am sure there are plenty of fantastic mothers doing a good job raising there children!!
I just dont get bitter about money, I would be more bitter if my sons father did not have any contact with him.
Its the contact thats going to make my son a happier and appreciative person. He will grown up with the love he needs to help him to develop the skills he needs to take him into his adult life....without any hang-ups.:j
could you have a word with my ex for me!!!!! jeez. the contact i get is a "priviledge" according to her. i used to get more till the lovely csa caseworker told her she'd get more by cutting down on the overnight stays as i had her for between 120-140 nights per year.
hey presto, contact gets cut down to less than 52 in an attempt to screw more out of me. lovely. 3 court visits and i'm back up to about 80 nights, plus the judge is none to pleased with her "attitude" and has informed her that she doesn't actually own our child. round 4 is coming up soon, so fingers crossed she keeps the lovely attitude she has for then eh?NEVER ARGUE WITH AN IDIOT. THEY'LL DRAG YOU DOWN TO THEIR LEVEL AND BEAT YOU WITH EXPERIENCE.
and, please. only thank when appropriate. not to boost idiots egos.0 -
What some of these people need to realise is that they and the child eventually benefit from the NRP having a good life and a good relationship with the child.
Short term greed will provide a lifetime of hurt and misery.0 -
wise words. next time she texts spouting off, i'll quote that to her!NEVER ARGUE WITH AN IDIOT. THEY'LL DRAG YOU DOWN TO THEIR LEVEL AND BEAT YOU WITH EXPERIENCE.
and, please. only thank when appropriate. not to boost idiots egos.0 -
could you have a word with my ex for me!!!!! jeez. the contact i get is a "priviledge" according to her. i used to get more till the lovely csa caseworker told her she'd get more by cutting down on the overnight stays as i had her for between 120-140 nights per year.
hey presto, contact gets cut down to less than 52 in an attempt to screw more out of me. lovely. 3 court visits and i'm back up to about 80 nights, plus the judge is none to pleased with her "attitude" and has informed her that she doesn't actually own our child. round 4 is coming up soon, so fingers crossed she keeps the lovely attitude she has for then eh?
My OH has the same problem as you and I really feel for you and your child, such precious time is being wasted.
Its such a shame cos when my OH son comes to stay(every other wkend) he always seems to be supressed, he never talks about his home, you would never here him say "had a laff with mum last night" just doesnt say nothing, ever, and if you ask him anything you feel like your prying!!
No matter how hard it may get, maintain as much contact as possible, try not to be beaten.0 -
I had some arrears in 2002 which i payed back direct to my X over a 4 year period . I couldnt understand why the csa were making such a stink about what i owed them and why they had added more arrears to cover the period whilst the child was with me. After doing some research and talking to friends i was handed some documents which clearly showed the secretary of state helping himself to 60% of an assessment from an NRP. Why was this happening why was the monay not going to PWC . I also have friends that have paid through DEO's for the duration of there CSA case and never missed a payment but are being informed by the CSA that they are £9000 in arrears which appears to be quite a common amount.these people are being taken to court for liability orders so that enforcment action can be taken against them I asked myself why and done some research only to discover that the agents of the csa have targets to reach and are payed performance related bonuses, so the more they recover the more bonus they earn. with regards to the secretary of state helping himself (i have evidence to prove this ) i beleive that the NRP's are paying back over payed benefits which are otherwise unretrievable. I have a friend who was owed £17000 by her X but the CSA gave her £500 and proceded with court action to recover the rest from the NRP i have scanned the documents and will be forwarding them for publishing in due course.I only speak of my own experiences. and research that i have carried out whilst dealing with my own case with the child support agency0
-
That is shocking!!!
Could it be the PWC was in receipt of benefits hence the money being paid to the Secretary of State.
My ex has arrears but some are due to the Secretary because I did receive X amount of unemployement benefit.
The NRP is meant to financially contribute to his/her child's upbringing but certainly not to contribute towards the Secretary's (large) wealth.
That is so disgusting!
Can you copy and paste the documents?0 -
what everyone seems to be forgetting is that the csa were set up as a means to recouperate some of the massive benefits bill run up by the vikki pollards of this land.
if it was set up to reduce poverty then those on benefits would have got more than a fiver a week wouldn't they? i know a guy who pays out the best part of £150 per WEEK, yet his ex gets a tenner of it. reducing poverty? my arze.NEVER ARGUE WITH AN IDIOT. THEY'LL DRAG YOU DOWN TO THEIR LEVEL AND BEAT YOU WITH EXPERIENCE.
and, please. only thank when appropriate. not to boost idiots egos.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards