We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Public sector borrowing soaring
Options
Comments
-
Maybe Dave can get the Argies to invade the Falklands again!My Debt Free Diary I owe:
July 16 £19700 Nov 16 £18002
Aug 16 £19519 Dec 16 £17708
Sep 16 £18780 Jan 17 £17082
Oct 16 £178730 -
-
amcluesent wrote: »Inflation is now the only option to reduce the real value of the debt.
The trouble is, most of the stuff that is really going to screw things up (pensions, healthcare, PFI and aged care) are index linked costs or (in the case of health and care) costs tend to rise at a higher rate than inflation.0 -
40% off inside one year. Bad xmas.0
-
The bottom line is, whichever way you slice this, the country is screwed.
Ho hum.Starting Debt: ~£20,000 01/01/2009. DFD: 20/11/2009 :j
Do something amazing. GIVE BLOOD.0 -
Doomsday: 30 per cent planned public spending cuts are biggest in history
"Secret plans to slash public spending by up to 30 per cent, with massive cuts affecting public transport, the Armed Forces, schools, hospitals and welfare benefits, are being drawn up by Whitehall mandarins.
The draconian proposals could see spending reduced by a staggering £75billion a year, the biggest cut in British history."
FAO council jobsworths, public-sector numpties, work-shy, gym-slip single mums, benefit-scroungers, 'elf'n'safety drones, Guardian readers, you're going to get a hell a surprise!0 -
amcluesent wrote: »The draconian proposals could see spending reduced by a staggering £75billion a year, the biggest cut in British history."
That being about a third of the Government debt being sold this financial year and that doesn't include off the books liabilities.
The UK is in for a very nasty shock at some point. You've lived beyond your means since the mid 1950s. At some point the liabilities will become due.0 -
I wouldn't get excited, amcluesent, any government that tried to do that would be destroyed... their political party would become like the liberal party after World War I... extinct.“The ideas of debtor and creditor as to what constitutes a good time never coincide.”
― P.G. Wodehouse, Love Among the Chickens0 -
I wouldn't get excited, amcluesent, any government that tried to do that would be destroyed... their political party would become like the liberal party after World War I... extinct.
And you reckoned a government that raised tax by 75 billion would be viable also? We need to face facts. We are living beyond our means. We have a SIGNIFICANT correction in living standards around the corner. We need to learn how to deal with that I am afraid. Throwing the dummy out of the cot isnt going to reduce the deficit.0 -
I think there are ways to raise taxes by 75 billion without anywhere near the disruption that cutting 75 billion off public spending would cause, certainly. I don't think you can do either without causing massive disruption to the economy, though. The bottom line is I think it would cause a recession deeper than the one we've just been through, and the public finances would probably end up in a worse state than they are now. The best way to cut the deficit is to encourage growth.
But if you must cut spending, taking a longer term approach of freezing wages, extending the pension age to 70, removing programs like ID cards, the aircraft cariers, trident, withdrawing from the wars in afghanistan and iraq, putting a 0.25% tax on all financial transactions and a 20% tax on all dividends and bond interest produced by financial industries (the bailout levy), extablishing a freeze on public sector spending in nominal terms, and encouraging inflation via quantative easing will have much the same effect without such extensive disruption in the short term.“The ideas of debtor and creditor as to what constitutes a good time never coincide.”
― P.G. Wodehouse, Love Among the Chickens0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards