Tribunal says CSA must pay £31K back to NRP but…

Zara33

Orson_Cart wrote: »

Im wondering why LizzyS posts have mysteriously dissapeared :rolleyes:

LizzyS didn't reply it was me :rolleyes:
I'm sure you will apologize to her.
Posts disappear quite often on MSE all it takes is a few to hit the red triangle button and !!!!!! your posts have gone

Orson_Cart_2

Soz my mistake.

It was you ranting on my post zara. I think an apology is also merited since deleting your rant implies your inappropriate statement in reply to my post.

Woody, it was my employer paying the CSA and took the CSA claim of money to be truthful. I think he was equally furious with the CSA since they lied about my circumstances to increase a higher gain they would otherwise have made. I was reading an artical where a judge said the CSA needs reform because it is clogging up courts and tribunals with NRPs claiming unfair charges and discouraging men from working and going on the dole.

Looking in the forums, it is evident that over charging NRP's is pandemic within the CSA.

MissMoneypenny

Orson_Cart wrote: »

I was reading an artical where a judge said the CSA needs reform because it is clogging up courts and tribunals with NRPs claiming unfair charges and discouraging men from working and going on the dole.

It might be better if parents attitudes towards their children, changed. The CSA wouldn't be needed if both parents paid the true amount that their children cost to feed and house.

Zara33

Orson_Cart wrote: »

Soz my mistake.

It was you ranting on my post zara. I think an apology is also merited since deleting your rant implies your inappropriate statement in reply to my post.

I don't do apologies, it was a genuine question which you replied with a rant, end of!

Dancing_Shoes

MissMoneypenny wrote: »

It might be better if parents attitudes towards their children, changed. The CSA wouldn't be needed if both parents paid the true amount that their children cost to feed and house.

If only that could be the case;)

shell_542

MissMoneypenny wrote: »

It might be better if parents attitudes towards their children, changed. The CSA wouldn't be needed if both parents paid the true amount that their children cost to feed and house.

Some parents.

The CSA is not only used when an NRP refuses to pay what they are supposed to either.

Sensemaya

Orson_Cart wrote: »

I am thinking of using some of the money to apply for a contact order or similar.

That was why I posted the link to the Court forms. C1 is the form you need to start an contact order.

MissMoneypenny

shell_542 wrote: »

.

The CSA is not only used when an NRP refuses to pay what they are supposed to either.

What they are "supposed to" and what it actually costs to keep their child, are often two different things.

LizzieS_2

MissMoneypenny wrote: »

It might be better if parents attitudes towards their children, changed. The CSA wouldn't be needed if both parents paid the true amount that their children cost to feed and house.

I wonder how many parents would agree what that cost is for their child (something says many will have 2 different figures)?

kelloggs36

That would be an impossible dream! For some, it is absolutely essential that their children have the best of everything, join all the clubs etc and this costs so much more than those who look at what they have and give the child what they can.