Quidco

Amistoso_2

Lynsey wrote: »

Yep, the ONLY two saddo's on MSE.
Brill that there's not more..............or is there???????????????

Lynsey

Too easy...

nah, pretty much just the two :rotfl::rotfl:
Ruthha's been awful quiet this afternoon, wonder why that is?

Torby

Lynsey, as I hope you know I have a lot of respect for you & yours and it pains me to see you get sucked in by someone (namely Ruthha) who is at best a con woman claiming all the things she's doing are for the "little man". Fair enough (as women) if you and Fenris want to jump to her defence if you feel she has been threatened (alledgedly, no one has seen any proof yet) fine, but don't fall for her empire building at the cost of others she purports to help.

Ask yourself the questions everyone else has been asking, what has Ruthha done...FOR ANYONE? , for goodness sake, PM her and ask in confidence who she has actually helped, at least you won't come on here and appear to be following someone with no real substance.

gordikin

ruthha telling us as a FACT that Martin Lewis doesn't own and run MSE. This does not inspire me with confidence in her judgement.

Torby

Reminds me of an old Tennants joke:

Saddo Sadder....Sadist...but thats for a completely different thread...and not to do with S & M Food adverts either....sorry M & S Food Adverts!...doh!

By the way Greggs lattices are better value than M & S

Fenris

Amistoso wrote: »

Get over yourself...

Well, since I'm not a contortionist, getting over myself is not physically possible.

She has absolutely nothing substantial to back up any of her claims, why hasn't anyone been on here saying otherwise?

Could it, perchance, have something to do with the fact that anyone posting anything negative about Quidco instantly gets jumped on by half a dozen people who seem to be fighting on behalf of Quidco? Could it be that they may be a touch warey of trying to comment without being virtually duffed up?

ged1980 wrote: »

make me look small then you started this now show us all you keep saying you are doing because i cant see nothing

Double negative.

you came on this forum asking for people to pm you and you say lots people did now how come we are not seeing them say thanks?

I refer you to the above.

Torby

FENRIS SAID:

"Could it, perchance, have something to do with the fact that anyone posting anything negative about Quidco"

How is stating whether or not you have achieved anything or helped people get their cashback negative? Surely if you have achieved something positive in your campaign and helped others...thats positive?

Sadly Fenris, it looks like you are being sucked into the sisterhood as well and fair enough defend a fellow woman (fellow woman...is that correct?) if you feel she's being duffed up (a totally different meaning no doubt to what I had in mind) although she has yet to show any evidence of this intimidation and threatening PMs she's received, sorry to say, but she's starting to sound like Katie Price...hint at something which is vile and degrading, but when challenged, refuse to do anything about it...meantime divert the attention from the real problem, who has been helped?...has anyone?...and to be honest If Quidco can make that statement, why can't Ruthha?

Fenris

quidco_Company_Representative wrote: »

Before I go, just to clarify, the amounts received by us and being paid to our members this month ARE as a result of the hard-working QuidCare (new name for member Support) staff's constant efforts behind the scenes.

Surely that's an oxymoron?

I would state categorically that there have been no external factors here.

Well yes, you would wouldn't you. I mean, you're hardly likely to say, "We've decided to pay the money to our customers because we've been rumbled." :rolleyes:

I do feel that credit is deserved where it is due and our staff, without exception, are dedicated and care deeply about all of our members and about the work that they do.

Well, yes, it's always nice to be praised for your work. Kind of depends on what you actually do though, doesn't it? Copy/pasting the same generic responses to questions, mummm, maybe not worth praising.

I will not enter into any debate about any of the content of this post, as it is factual and honest.

And yet, as so many other members of this thread are keen to ask, where's the proof? Oh no, wait, anything written by Quidco staff members doesn't need to be proven. Whatever's posted is accepted as the truth without any further questioning.

Amistoso wrote: »

there it is in black and white Ruthha!!!!!

Yes, black and white! Whoo hoo! Would be nice if we could all believe every last thing anyone writes wouldn't it?

Oh, did you know that I'm currently sitting in a sphere about the size of a house on the moon typing this? And that's the truth!

ged1980 wrote: »

yes

now if i was Ruthha i would fight back and tell us all what she has done but i dont think we will see it :rolleyes:

Would there be any point? You won't believe her anyway.

Fenris

Lynsey wrote: »

If ruttha had posted the conflicting posts she would have got hammered!!

What is the truth, certainly the first quote is an untruth, how about the latter??

Lynsey

Ah, but because it's posted by Jules it must be the truth, never to be questioned by anyone! :rolleyes:

Amistoso wrote: »

Yip, except one of them was the correct tune and one was a load of old crap!!! lol

Oh, so you've finally realised you're all full of crap eh? Well done! :T We knew that all along.

Lynsey

Many thanks Torby for your respect, I also respect your intelligence.
Others can't seem to suss that it's ok to bash ruttha for her posts and yet it's 100% ok for Jules to "mess up".
Surely you must realise this, it's not "rocket science".
Who are the saddo's then??
Just be equal and fair, if at all possible.

Lynsey

Torby

OK then everyone, why don't we all cut to the chase, forget Oxyclean etc

Quidco say they've processed things without anyone elses help, no external influence

Ruthha, have you helped the "little man" or achieved anything from your campaign...?

Quidco have already said their bit, all Ruthha (or anyone who wants to claim she's helped them ) have to do is say their bit.

Then everyone can make up their own mind as to who's lying, fabricating stories etc

what's the problem with that? and the debate can be put to bed