We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

SATA drives: IDE or AHCI mode...?

esuhl
esuhl Posts: 9,409 Forumite
Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
I've just built a new PC, and am wondering whether to set the SATA hard drive(s) to IDE or AHCI mode in the BIOS. I've spent the last hour searching the web, but have just got a lot of contradicting advice.

AHCI includes all the features of IDE, but also allows hot-swapping and NCQ. So one would think it would be the best choice... but apparently NCQ can reduce drive performance in a normal desktop environment.

However, my PC seemed to boot and open Firefox quicker when I installed XP with the drive in AHCI mode. In fact, some of the people who said that AHCI mode is slower had installed the OS on IDE-mode drives, then changed to AHCI, so I wonder if changing the setting once the OS is installed causes a reduction in performance, rather than AHCI itself...?

And Intel suggest you set the SATA mode to RAID (which uses AHCI) for maximum flexibility. I definitely won't be using RAID, but this suggests that AHCI is better than IDE mode. XP doesn't have AHCI drivers by default, but I have slipstreamed them onto a CD using nLite.

So... I'm confused! I intend to install XP, Windows 7 and Slackware-64 on to the PC. Can I ask which mode you would choose (or have chosen) and why?

Which mode would you use for SATA hard drives? 2 votes

IDE
0%
AHCI
100%
esuhlamcluesent 2 votes

Comments

  • There are some benchmarks here:
    http://expertester.wordpress.com/2008/07/24/ahci-vs-ide-%E2%80%93-benchmark-advantage/

    To be honest while the differences are measurable I doubt you'll see any objective improvememt in 'real world' performance. When I upgraded from PATA to SATA I could measure the improvements but it really didn't have a big impact on the performance of my applications.

    I imagine that if you couldn't find a definitive answer through your searches it's unlikely one mode is streets ahead of the other.
  • esuhl
    esuhl Posts: 9,409 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    AHCI
    Thanks - that's a really good article. I've read a bit more and it looks like AHCI *might* be a bit quicker due to NCQ.

    Also, I'm not sure how reliable this review of my HDD is, but it says the drive has "dual-processors for bleeding fast Native Command Queing", so maybe my particular drive will show a greater performance difference with AHCI.

    I guess there's probably not much in it...
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.2K Life & Family
  • 260.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.