We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Office deposit question

toby1kenobi
Posts: 8 Forumite
Hi there,
My company just moved out of the small office we're renting, and the landlord is basically engineering things so we don't get any deposit back.
They've inspected the place, and come up with a range of issues and associated costs to rectify them, that mysteriously add up to more or less exactly our deposit.
Most of the 'faults' are just to do with the age of the property, i.e. the floor is quite old and a bit worn, and they're saying it needs replacing (in itself questionable). We haven't done anything other than walk around on it, but they're saying that the lease stipulates the premises must be kept 'in repair'; in fact, they've explicitly said that anything not 'in repair' at the commencement of the lease should have been fixed by us?! This seems crazy to me, and obviously not something we'd have knowingly signed up to.
Does anyone know if what I've described is actually legal?!
Thanks,
Toby[FONT="][/FONT][FONT="][/FONT]
My company just moved out of the small office we're renting, and the landlord is basically engineering things so we don't get any deposit back.
They've inspected the place, and come up with a range of issues and associated costs to rectify them, that mysteriously add up to more or less exactly our deposit.
Most of the 'faults' are just to do with the age of the property, i.e. the floor is quite old and a bit worn, and they're saying it needs replacing (in itself questionable). We haven't done anything other than walk around on it, but they're saying that the lease stipulates the premises must be kept 'in repair'; in fact, they've explicitly said that anything not 'in repair' at the commencement of the lease should have been fixed by us?! This seems crazy to me, and obviously not something we'd have knowingly signed up to.
Does anyone know if what I've described is actually legal?!
Thanks,
Toby[FONT="][/FONT][FONT="][/FONT]
0
Comments
-
I don't know but the first thing I would be doing is taking photographs of everything as evidence. If you can print them off and get someone from another nearby office to sign and date them, it could be a big help.0
-
they're saying that the lease stipulates the premises must be kept 'in repair'; in fact, they've explicitly said that anything not 'in repair' at the commencement of the lease should have been fixed by us?!
You will have to read the lease carefully, but that's quite likely to be the position. When you took the lease you should have had the place checked by a surveyor and if there were issues of disrepair then you should have either renegotiated the wording of the lease so you were not liable for them or obtained a rent free period so you could put them right.
In some cases it might have been agreed that you covenanted to keep it in no worse condition than at the date of the lease as evidenced by a schedule of condition dated ...and signed by the parties. The schedule then would have contained detailed descriptions and photographs so that they are looked at when the surveyor goes round at the end of the lease.
Did you have a solicitor advise you when you took the premises?RICHARD WEBSTER
As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.0 -
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your reply, what you're saying closely resembles the most recent email we're received from the landlord! I wasn't actually with the company at the point of signing the lease, but I suspect legal advice wasn't sought...which we may come to regret!
Thanks again,
Toby0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards