We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

AGP Memory Allocation

Oblivion
Oblivion Posts: 20,248 Forumite
Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic
I have an old Dell Precision 340 workstation running XP Pro (SP3) with 2Gb RAM and a Radeon VE 32Mb video card set to 1024 x 768.

This week I started getting "Backup battery low voltage" messages. So after taking a snapshot of the BIOS settings (quite literally with a digital camera) I replaced the battery, and then had to reset some of the BIOS settings to their original values.

Whilst doing this I noticed one BIOS setting called "Memory allocated to AGP adapter" which had been set by Dell to 128Mb. The full range of choices were 32Mb, 64Mb, 128Mb, and 256Mb. I'm not that computer savvy, but I suppose that this is a way of reserving some of the system RAM for video card use to supplement the card's onboard 32Mb.

My question is, given that I have 2Gb of RAM, is there any technical reason why I should not set the AGP allocation to the maximum available 256Mb? Just worried that there may be a good reason why Dell set it to 128Mb.

Oh, and please no recommendations for a better card thank you, I'm just looking to get the max out of what I already have.

Dave.
... Dave
Happily retired and enjoying my 14th year of leisure
I am cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
Bring me sunshine in your smile

Comments

  • martin8_2
    martin8_2 Posts: 68 Forumite
    128mb is just the default setting by Dell as the typical amount back then. I don't believe there is any technical reason why you can't try the 256mb setting. It will decrease the availability of it to the system which may decrease system performance e.g. cannot open as many programs at the same time without it becoming more noticeable sluggish. If it doesn't make any noticeable difference (graphics-wise) you can always bump it back down to 128mb.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.