PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Landlord quits deposit protection scheme!

13»

Comments

  • clutton_2
    clutton_2 Posts: 11,149 Forumite
    good idea MissMP
  • tbs624
    tbs624 Posts: 10,816 Forumite
    clutton wrote: »
    what tenants dont appear to realised about Mydeposits (unlike DPS which is free) - is that landlords have to BUY a subscription/joining fee to mydeposits, then buy a Tenancy insurance policy - which they then have to buy AGAIN every time a new tenancy agreement is signed .... it aint cheap .. and it encourages landlords to keep tenants on periodic tenancies.....
    (My highlighting) Now come on Clutton, those fees - one off membership £57.50(or 20 quid for NLA members), plus just under 30 quid to register the actual deposit (c£17 if deposit less than £300) are the sort of costs for which most LLs will plan when setting out their forthcoming rental figures. So, let's take a LL with half a dozen properties - less than £3.30 per month gross cost of registering that deposit in the first year (because currently no membership renewal fee for exisitng members).

    Then let's remember that the LL retains the actual deposit funds for the duration of the tenancy, and that the fees are, of course, tax deductible. .....looking pretty cheap for the cover I reckon.:smiley:


    .
  • tbs624
    tbs624 Posts: 10,816 Forumite
    clutton wrote: »
    this could be a cheap way for tenants to get their own recent no-CCJ records to show to a private landlord by way of referencing themselves
    I think you' re possibly right if its a LL who is self-managing and combining it with other checks, but for any LL using rent guarantee insurance the checks have to be completed to their specification. For a T to ask for his/her own check to be used as the basis for their decisions would perhaps be similar to expecting house buyers to rely on a survey provided by the seller rather than getting their own done.
  • clutton_2
    clutton_2 Posts: 11,149 Forumite
    i just recalled - one of the schemes (can't remember which) has said that it will no longer be offering cover to landlords who also act as lettings agents but who are not members of ARLA or other professional bodies - this could be another legitimate reason why the LL is being withdrawn
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.