Car Scrappage Scheme Extended

System

Graham there's a difference between twisting what someone says, and saying what the outcome of whatever bizarre idea someone comes up with would be.

I wouldn't be surprised to see this conversation soon:

G_D: We should ban food.
AN Other: What, you want people to starve?
G_D: TUT NO Did I say that? Stop twisting what I say!!

Really2

nearlynew wrote: »

Before I answer, when I was in school, it was "written".

.

Wrote is correct actually. I was writing you had wrote the same phrase before.:p

I may have the odd English problem but because I had used

"Second time you have wrote that."

Which means, I have to use wrote, If I said "Second time someone" it would have been written.

2-0 to me, thanks:)

nearlynew

Really2 wrote: »

Wrote is correct actually. I was writing you had wrote the same phrase before.:p

I may have the odd English problem but becuse I used

Second time you have wrote that.

You means I have to use wrote is I said "Second time someone" it would have been written.

2-0 to me, thanks:)

............................ You what?

Really2

nearlynew wrote: »

............................ You what?

Really2 wrote: »

Wrote is correct actually. I was writing you had wrote the same phrase before.:p

I may have the odd English problem but becuse I had used

"Second time you have wrote that."

Which means I have to use wrote, If I said "Second time someone" it would have been written.

2-0 to me, thanks:)

I have edited it now, but are you still stand by what you wrote (not written:)?

Oh your wrong so you now pretend you don't understand. I think we know where this one goes. Who's sockie are you then.:rolleyes:

nearlynew

Really2 wrote: »

Oh your wrong so you now pretend you don't understand. I think we know where this one goes. Who's sockie are you then.:rolleyes:

:rotfl:

Thanks for correcting my English.
(and you missed out the question mark, by the way)


I'm backing out of this thread now, because it looks like it's just going to get silly.

Graham_Devon

Really, if you just stuck to what he and she ACTUALLY said instead of trying to suggest they are saying soemthing else, we wouldnt get to this stage of no one having a clue what anyone else is on about.

Quite frankly, I have asolutely no idea what you are now trying to tell the forum and will leaveit here as it will just go on and on and on.

Really2

nearlynew wrote: »

:rotfl:

Thanks for correcting my English.
.

It was you correcting mine

nearlynew wrote: »

Before I answer, when I was in school, it was "written".
.

Wrongly.


Do you have short term memory problems..:rolleyes:

Really2

Graham_Devon wrote: »

Quite frankly, I have asolutely no idea what you are now trying to tell the forum and will leaveit here as it will just go on and on and on.

OK Lets go back on topic.

Really2 wrote: »

Second time you have wrote that.

Could you explain how removing one car from the road and scraping it, then replacing it with a new one = more cars?

At school 1-1 always = 0

PS have you got the figures on how much debt it as caused?

Before the double act came in.

That is fairly simple to understand, even for you two.:rolleyes:

bo_drinker

Fk me, the amount of threads that end up pointless ranting, you said this, no I didn't I meant that etc etc etc. Is it me.........

Really2

bo_drinker wrote: »

Is it me.........

No it's Graham and Nearlynew:)