We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
'No quick return' to housing boom
Comments
- 
            HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »

:rolleyes:0 - 
            I'm more interested (and tend to believe more) the story above about a woman paying 88k interest on a debt of £500.
Was that the boom Hamish?
(PS posting the Express on a nice forum like this is the equivelant of wearing Dunlop trainers at school when you're a kid)I'll have some cheese please, bob.0 - 
            The normally bullish RICS are sounding words of caution regarding 2010, they're not quite going as far as me when calling 2009 a 'fake year' propped up by massive government borrowing, but for them to say 'the outlook remains clouded' is a nod and a wink to the reality of the situation.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8185515.stm
As far as 2009 is concerned, I think the government and the media need to be commended, with 'talk' and 'borrowing' they seem to have convinced a large portion of the public that the emporer has a great new outfit on again. Something that seemed unimagineable last winter.
so no 70% drops, no 50% drops and no 30% drops
some people got it horribly wrong...0 - 
            Mizzbizz, if interested in that story you may wish to look here http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?t=1861849
I'm intrigued that 2 similar stories are reported on the same day, & wonder why...
I have worked with the loanshark task force in birmingham & have been very impressed by them.It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.0 - 
            so no 70% drops, no 50% drops and no 30% drops
some people got it horribly wrong...
tbf don't really think there were many suggestions of 70% drops from anyone, or that you really need to bolster your own outlook via comparisons to minority extreme oppositional views. there were some 50% drop predictions out there, though I never thought that likely. I did think the falls would be greater than 30%, not really seeing anything thats changed my opinion on that tbhPrefer girls to money0 - 
            the_ash_and_the_oak wrote: »tbf don't really think there were many suggestions of 70% drops from anyone, or that you really need to bolster your own outlook via comparisons to minority extreme oppositional views.
yes only on this forum not in reality - and i have no need to bolster my own outlook. it's very amusing that there were/are these people knocking about.the_ash_and_the_oak wrote: »there were some 50% drop predictions out there, though I never thought that likely.
again extremely unlikely but a large majority on this forum - some are still about and still think (hope) that they'll drop 50%. shame it's not going to happen... what social and economic repurcussions do you think would come with 50% house drops?the_ash_and_the_oak wrote: »I did think the falls would be greater than 30%, not really seeing anything thats changed my opinion on that tbh
30%?? now that is reasonable - 35% or even 40%. not in my viewpoint but general viewpoint. i never thought it would be 30% but i never dismissed it like the 50% and 70%...
you would live in fantasy land and be out of touch of reality if you expected 50% average drops or more in the whole of the UK.0 - 
            Its probably better to engage with realistic oppositional arguments tbh. a 'victory' against more outlandish arguments from an opposite view does a disservice to both sides of an argumentPrefer girls to money0
 - 
            the_ash_and_the_oak wrote: »Its probably better to engage with realistic oppositional arguments tbh. a 'victory' against more outlandish arguments from an opposite view does a disservice to both sides of an argument
My 'Spring 2009 bottom' was consided outlandish.0 - 
            
 - 
            the_ash_and_the_oak wrote: »Its probably better to engage with realistic oppositional arguments tbh. a 'victory' against more outlandish arguments from an opposite view does a disservice to both sides of an argument
but when a less pessimistic view is put forward and is dismissed i find it highly amusing that these 'people' with such extreme views still think it's going to happen.
i wish them good luck but doesn't stop me laughing at them :beer:0 
This discussion has been closed.
            Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
 - 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
 - 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
 - 454.3K Spending & Discounts
 - 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
 - 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
 - 177.5K Life & Family
 - 259.1K Travel & Transport
 - 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
 - 16K Discuss & Feedback
 - 37.7K Read-Only Boards