Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Government plough £1bn into "soft jobs"

245

Comments

  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    bo_drinker wrote: »

    Hmmm,

    Some of these jobs seem a bit specialised to me .Not something you can force people into, which IS the case....

    Childcare? Classroom assistants? Social Carers?

    I'd be a bit worried about forcing people into these positions to be honest.

    Dance classes and loft laggers are one thing, but caring type jobs? That's plain dangerous, surely?
  • kabayiri
    kabayiri Posts: 22,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    When you pump 1bn into a new area, it's very difficult to ensure it all gets spent as planned.

    There will be parties with vested interest working out ingenious but effective ways of getting their share of the cake.

    In coming months, expect to see stories appearing stating "I was taken on as a XYZ and left to play minesweeper on the PC all day"

    (not that being skilled in playing minesweeper is a bad thing you understand :) )
  • baileysbattlebus
    baileysbattlebus Posts: 1,443 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 29 July 2009 at 7:06PM
    Hmmm,

    Some of these jobs seem a bit specialised to me .Not something you can force people into, which IS the case....

    Childcare? Classroom assistants? Social Carers?

    I'd be a bit worried about forcing people into these positions to be honest.

    Dance classes and loft laggers are one thing, but caring type jobs? That's plain dangerous, surely?

    Obviously they can't force people into jobs like this - for a start you have to have a criminal records background check and good references to work with children. Social carers also usually have to have a CRB and if the jobs are through the council they need to have good references too. At least at our council you do.

    Some people just aren't cut out to work with children or the elderly or the disabled as I'm sure both you and the powers that be know, or are you just being obtuse?
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Obviously they can't force people into jobs like this - for a start you have to have a criminal records background check and good references to work with children. Social carers also usually have to have a CRB and if the jobs are through the council they need to have good references too. At least at our council you do.

    Some people just aren't cut out to work with children or the elderly as I'm sure you and the powers that be know, or are you just being obtuse?

    I'm not being obtuse.

    The story, and the government has said if they do not take the jobs, their benefits will be cut.

    Make of that what you will.
  • My gripe is not the jobs.

    My gripe is the £1bn we do not have which they are funding this with.

    What costs less? 15,000 people getting JSA, Income Support, Housing Benefit, Council Tax Benefit, paying no tax and spending little money in the economy. Or someone working, paying tax and spending money?

    Its not like the economy can't support an additional 15,000 jobs - how many have been lost since the crash?
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    What costs less? 15,000 people getting JSA, Income Support, Housing Benefit, Council Tax Benefit, paying no tax and spending little money in the economy. Or someone working, paying tax and spending money?

    Its not like the economy can't support an additional 15,000 jobs - how many have been lost since the crash?

    Where have you got 15,000 from? It's 47,000, plus it saves no money, the government will still be paying them, hence costing £1bn.
  • Where have you got 15,000 from?

    When I type 150,000 and miss off the last 0......
  • baileysbattlebus
    baileysbattlebus Posts: 1,443 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 29 July 2009 at 8:10PM
    I'm not being obtuse.

    The story, and the government has said if they do not take the jobs, their benefits will be cut.

    Make of that what you will.

    According to the gov't - candidates will be interviewed by employers for the jobs - with the most suitable being offered a job and feedback to be given to unsuccesful candidates.
    Gordon Brown has announced that those who refuse a "suitable job offer" could lose two weeks benefit, four weeks if they turn a job down a second time and 26 weeks for a third time.

    Of course only a minimum of 25 hours a week has to be worked and the jobs have to pay at least minimum wage and last for a minimum of 6 months - so the pay is not great - though I don't know what JSA is for 18 - 24 year olds. Not a lot I imagine.

    The part of your post I disagreed with was that people would be forced into jobs like child care - they won't - they will have to apply and be selected for the jobs.. They won't be told to and start work somewhere on Monday morning. People will probably apply for the type of job they would prefer.
    Q: Can I interview candidates to check their suitability?
    A: Yes – we would expect that employers would want to interview candidates and select the right one or ones for the job. However feedback must be offered to unsuccessful applicants. And in general, we would expect bidders to ensure that the jobs are suitable and attractive to eligible claimants and then to employ as many people as they have bid for.
    [/QUOTE]

    They may be told to apply for jobs - but like I said you can't force people into social care jobs. It would be unthinkable.

    Companies and councils have been bidding for the money.

    The newspapers aren't always correct.
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    When I type 150,000 and miss off the last 0......

    Fair enough.
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 29 July 2009 at 8:23PM
    According to the gov't - candidates will be interviewed by employers for the jobs - with the most suitable being offered a job and feedback to be given to unsuccesful candidates.
    This is really simple from my POV.

    I do not believe the government. They are so desperate they turn to this.

    I believe we will see some horror stories from some of these roles. That's just my opinion. Not once have this government ever done something as they said they would. I don't see why this would be any different at a time when they will do literally anything (hence this) to get people off the unemployment figures.

    Up to you if you believe people will not just end up as child carers.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.