We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Tax implications of renting out property

Need some advice here. Someone I know owns a flat but has moved to another city with the company they work for and is renting a property there as they don't want to sell their property. They are planning to rent their flat out simply to cover their mortgage (or maybe even for less than their mortgage if they can't get someone in) but it has been mentioned to them that this may be seen as additional income and if the inland revenue find out they would be liable to pay tax on it. Does anyone know if that is correct? Surely as they're not making money on it (and in fact may be losing money if they can't get the full rent for it) they wouldn't have to pay tax?

Comments

  • Idonex
    Idonex Posts: 105 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 22 July 2009 at 9:00PM
    It is classed as taxable income. If your friend makes a profit they will need to pax tax on any profit made. They will need to declare their profit or loss to the tax office each year. If they do make a loss then they wont pay any tax until they make a profit.

    As far as working out whether they are making a profit or not, the taxable amount is worked out on the profit minus allowable expenses. Allowable expenses include agency fees, service charges, mortgage interest, gas/energy certifcates etc.

    In my case i rent out our flat for 865 a month but the mortgage interest, service charge and agency fees mean i end up -15 worse off, so i dont pay any tax although i do need to still declare the loss.

    This has lots of useful information:

    http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTaxAndBenefits/Taxes/TaxOnPropertyAndRentalIncome/DG_10013435
  • Fire_Fox
    Fire_Fox Posts: 26,026 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    They also need the permission of the mortgage provider, and possibly the freeholder.
    Declutterbug-in-progress.⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️
  • Mrs_Bumble
    Mrs_Bumble Posts: 1,028 Forumite
    You do have to declare the income, but the other side to that is that you also keep accounts of all your expenses etc, so probably won't be much tax implication but it is very important to declare everything and be above board.

    If a tenant goes in and claims housing benefit for instance the inland revenue can see the records of who it is paid to etc and if they are not declaring an income from letting ....
    I am a Mortgage Adviser

    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • tbs624
    tbs624 Posts: 10,816 Forumite
    Bulletcraig - are you talking about your own LL?
  • franklee
    franklee Posts: 3,867 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic
    Should be fairly easy to run at a loss unless a LL is on a great tracker deal, in which case he is a happy bunny anyway. Sounds like your friend will have no tax to pay.
  • BulletCraig
    BulletCraig Posts: 85 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    tbs624 wrote: »
    Bulletcraig - are you talking about your own LL?
    No, it's actually my flatmate I'm talking about. We both moved with work so she obviously had to leave her flat behind.

    Thanks for all the advice guys, will pass on the good news.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    franklee wrote: »
    Should be fairly easy to run at a loss unless a LL is on a great tracker deal, in which case he is a happy bunny anyway. Sounds like your friend will have no tax to pay.

    Strange view. Why run at a loss?

    If you do have a tax liability it means you're making a profit. ;)

    Little point in subsidising a loss making business in the hope of one day making a capital gain. Particularly in the current market.
  • franklee
    franklee Posts: 3,867 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    Strange view. Why run at a loss?

    If you do have a tax liability it means you're making a profit. ;)

    Little point in subsidising a loss making business in the hope of one day making a capital gain. Particularly in the current market.
    Well I don't know why run at a loss, I suppose it means make sure all expenses that can be claimed for are. With rental yields so low I expect it is easy enough to be at break even/sight loss. As for why do that, dunno, perhaps an attempt to stem capital losses/ wait for gains :D Could be a long wait. Or maybe if someone just wanted to hang onto a property to return to it later :confused:
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    franklee wrote: »
    Well I don't know why run at a loss, I suppose it means make sure all expenses that can be claimed for are. With rental yields so low I expect it is easy enough to be at break even/sight loss. As for why do that, dunno, perhaps an attempt to stem capital losses/ wait for gains :D Could be a long wait. Or maybe if someone just wanted to hang onto a property to return to it later :confused:

    I suggest a long wait, in the meantime :beer:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.