We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
MP3 or WMA?
Options
Comments
-
If you intend to keep the CDs and the player is an Ipod, I'd go for AAC at about 224mbit/sec
Otherwise, rip using Exact Audio Copy (EAC) and the LAME encoder with one of the presets; try standard and extreme on the same music to see if you can tell the difference
This guide will explain how to use EAC and LAME to best effect.0 -
Another vote for LAME. I've been using it for years now and nothing else touches it. You can use the DLL as a plugin for Audiograbber.
Best of all, both LAME and Audiograbber are free!0 -
It would depend on how sensitive you heraing is, I unfortunate haev sensitive hearing so I can tell the difference although its elss between 160kbps to 192kbps than 128kbps and 192kbps.
Variable bitrate often is the best way to go as it can vary i depending on whats playing, mp2's are normally files that have been ncoded to remove things you can hear and silence parts etc.
Generally the higher the bitrate the better, and as you got a 30gb player I would keep the bitrate high say 256kbps variable to 192kbps, files will be around 7-9 mb each on average song of 3 minutes.heatherw_01 wrote:Can you still tell the difference between 128 and 192 if you rip from a cd?0 -
heatherw_01 wrote:I have personal music player and wondered what bitrate and format to use?
Any recommendations?
Edit to say I am ripping from my cd's and I have a 30gb player
As mentioned by others MP3 is more widely supported than WMA, but if your player supports both (many do) then in theory WMA is supposed to give better compression than MP3. I think Microsoft claim that 64bit encoding with WMA is equivalent in sound quality to 128bit with MP3, although I think I remember reading a 'blinded' test suggesting that is was more like 96bit WMA being equivalent to 128bit MP3.
The higher the bit rate you choose, the better the quality, but the bigger the file.0 -
Need_More_Money wrote:think Microsoft claim that 64bit encoding with WMA is equivalent in sound quality to 128bit with MP3.
I have a creative and tried both 128bit MP3's and 64Bit WMA's, the WMA's are smaller and on the MP3 player I can't hear any loss of sound quality (god damn awful when burnt to a CD mind) so I use that for everything that goes on my MP3 player now. I use DBpowerAMP to convert everything. Saved me a lot of space.Sigless0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards