📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

MP3 or WMA?

Options
2»

Comments

  • amcluesent
    amcluesent Posts: 9,425 Forumite
    If you intend to keep the CDs and the player is an Ipod, I'd go for AAC at about 224mbit/sec

    Otherwise, rip using Exact Audio Copy (EAC) and the LAME encoder with one of the presets; try standard and extreme on the same music to see if you can tell the difference ;)

    This guide will explain how to use EAC and LAME to best effect.
  • nickmack
    nickmack Posts: 4,435 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Another vote for LAME. I've been using it for years now and nothing else touches it. You can use the DLL as a plugin for Audiograbber.

    Best of all, both LAME and Audiograbber are free!
  • Poppycat
    Poppycat Posts: 19,899 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    It would depend on how sensitive you heraing is, I unfortunate haev sensitive hearing so I can tell the difference although its elss between 160kbps to 192kbps than 128kbps and 192kbps.

    Variable bitrate often is the best way to go as it can vary i depending on whats playing, mp2's are normally files that have been ncoded to remove things you can hear and silence parts etc.

    Generally the higher the bitrate the better, and as you got a 30gb player I would keep the bitrate high say 256kbps variable to 192kbps, files will be around 7-9 mb each on average song of 3 minutes.
    Can you still tell the difference between 128 and 192 if you rip from a cd?
  • I have personal music player and wondered what bitrate and format to use?

    Any recommendations?

    Edit to say I am ripping from my cd's and I have a 30gb player

    As mentioned by others MP3 is more widely supported than WMA, but if your player supports both (many do) then in theory WMA is supposed to give better compression than MP3. I think Microsoft claim that 64bit encoding with WMA is equivalent in sound quality to 128bit with MP3, although I think I remember reading a 'blinded' test suggesting that is was more like 96bit WMA being equivalent to 128bit MP3.
    The higher the bit rate you choose, the better the quality, but the bigger the file.
  • Rev
    Rev Posts: 3,171 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    think Microsoft claim that 64bit encoding with WMA is equivalent in sound quality to 128bit with MP3.

    I have a creative and tried both 128bit MP3's and 64Bit WMA's, the WMA's are smaller and on the MP3 player I can't hear any loss of sound quality (god damn awful when burnt to a CD mind) so I use that for everything that goes on my MP3 player now. I use DBpowerAMP to convert everything. Saved me a lot of space.
    Sigless
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.