We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
The Forum is currently experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Hmmmmm

Pobby
Posts: 5,438 Forumite
In a street by me the last house sold in 2003 for £99,500. In June last year another one came on the market and it needed gutting. Was bought for £83,000. The new owner is a serial landlord and did a nice job of refurbing. It sold in December last year for £135,000.
The odd thing is that the original land lord is still visiting the rented out house. Could this be a tax thing?
The odd thing is that the original land lord is still visiting the rented out house. Could this be a tax thing?
0
Comments
-
Why not ask him?
Glad you're not my nosy neighbour.Been away for a while.0 -
We had a couple of property developers who bought a property in our block through their limited company and refurbished it, then purchased it themselves as private individuals for an extra £40k on the original purchase price and moved in.
An optimistic scenario is they they did this to release funds for their next project. A cynical scenario is that as their limited company became insolvent shortly after without submitting any accounts, they've managed to refurb their personal property for free and protect the property from the creditors because it is no longer owned by the company.
In the case you outlined, perhaps the original landlord did something similar or perhaps the person they sold it to wanted them to manage the rental or perhaps they know the tenants and its a social call - landlords are free to let property to relatives. If your curiosity is insatiable, just buy the ownership details from the land registry.0 -
Or perhaps they're an MP?0
-
Could well be a tax dodge. Who you going to call? taxbusters!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.3K Spending & Discounts
- 243.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.7K Life & Family
- 256.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards