We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Advice Please - new engine or new (used) car?
Options
Comments
-
Ask the garage to take the throttle body off ( only 4 bolts so 5 minutes work ) and see if there is any sign of oil inside the inlet manifold.
I had exactly the same problem with a Mondeo burning oil , failed the MOT badly on the emissions test and I was told it needed a reconditioned enginge.
I heard about the oil in the inlet manifold on the Mondeo forums -
http://www.fordmondeo.org/index.php?
and decided to look into the problem further.
I removed the inlet manifold and cleaned it out with degreaser , behind the manifold there is an oil seperator which has a PCV valve ( crancase ventilation) which is part of the emissions control , I cleaned out the oil seperator and changed the PCV valve ( around £12 for Fords ) and tried it again.
First off it was very smokey as I was still burning some of the gunk off but after a few miles I put a bottle of Cataclean in it which claims to clean the valves etc and drove it for a few more miles and it was a lot better.
I took it back for a retest and it didn't just pass it flew it as it was a fraction of the maximum figures allowed.
Total sum spent was under £30 , not bad when compared to the quotes of £800 + I was getting for recon engines.
Edit : - Here's the before and after emissions test results
Original test -
CO level 3.33% Maximum allowed is 0.3%
HC level 1085ppm Maximum allowed is 200 ppm
Re test
CO level 0.16%
HC level 18ppm0 -
I would want to be rid of it personally as it sounds like a liability now.
I disagree.
With the engine and clutch replaced (as well as the other bits that's been done previously) it's far less likely to go expensively wrong.
Get more than one quote for the engine before you make a decision.0 -
I disagree.
With the engine and clutch replaced (as well as the other bits that's been done previously) it's far less likely to go expensively wrong.
Get more than one quote for the engine before you make a decision.
Does depend to some extend on how many miles you do, low mileage and you will at least get more time if not more miles out of the car at reasonable maintenenace cost.0 -
Ask the garage to take the throttle body off ( only 4 bolts so 5 minutes work ) and see if there is any sign of oil inside the inlet manifold.
I had exactly the same problem with a Mondeo burning oil , failed the MOT badly on the emissions test and I was told it needed a reconditioned enginge.
I heard about the oil in the inlet manifold on the Mondeo forums -
http://www.fordmondeo.org/index.php?
and decided to look into the problem further.
I removed the inlet manifold and cleaned it out with degreaser , behind the manifold there is an oil seperator which has a PCV valve ( crancase ventilation) which is part of the emissions control , I cleaned out the oil seperator and changed the PCV valve ( around £12 for Fords ) and tried it again.
First off it was very smokey as I was still burning some of the gunk off but after a few miles I put a bottle of Cataclean in it which claims to clean the valves etc and drove it for a few more miles and it was a lot better.
I took it back for a retest and it didn't just pass it flew it as it was a fraction of the maximum figures allowed.
Total sum spent was under £30 , not bad when compared to the quotes of £800 + I was getting for recon engines.
Edit : - Here's the before and after emissions test results
Original test -
CO level 3.33% Maximum allowed is 0.3%
HC level 1085ppm Maximum allowed is 200 ppm
Re test
CO level 0.16%
HC level 18ppm
How much is Cataclean?:o0 -
0
-
0
-
Cataclean sounds like another of the standard additive scams, certainly the Advertising Standards Authority thinks so and told the company to withdraw its adverts:
The expert advised that catalyst efficiency was established by analysing the exhaust gases entering and exiting the catalyst. He noted the submitted tests did not use that method. The expert advised that the product was extremely unlikely to survive the combustion process and reach the exhaust catalyst. We considered that the claim was misleading.
http://www.asa.org.uk/asa/adjudications/Public/TF_ADJ_41571
It's much more likely that's Wayne3765's mondeo suffered from a well documented case of oil seeping into the inlet manifold and he cured that, than some miraculous snake oil cleaning his catalyst by mysterious and unexplained means.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards