We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
private parking charge notice confusion
petsathome
Posts: 1 Newbie
Hi!
I recently had a letter from Excel charging me 60 pounds (going up to 100 if not paid within 14 days) for allegedly overstaying for 16 minutes in a 3 hours free car park. The consensus on the consumer forum I asked is that I should not respond at all, but reading the article here it says I should write a letter. But in a sticky forum post above it says I should ignore.
I understand that it is not a fine I got but that they are trying to allege breach of contract. What is the best course of action here? Do I appear more guilty by not responding at all?
Also, they say the liability for the pcn lies with the owner/keeper/driver/hirer - from what I understand it is the driver only that is responsible though.
Thanks for any advice!
I recently had a letter from Excel charging me 60 pounds (going up to 100 if not paid within 14 days) for allegedly overstaying for 16 minutes in a 3 hours free car park. The consensus on the consumer forum I asked is that I should not respond at all, but reading the article here it says I should write a letter. But in a sticky forum post above it says I should ignore.
I understand that it is not a fine I got but that they are trying to allege breach of contract. What is the best course of action here? Do I appear more guilty by not responding at all?
Also, they say the liability for the pcn lies with the owner/keeper/driver/hirer - from what I understand it is the driver only that is responsible though.
Thanks for any advice!
0
Comments
-
1)Its not a PCN, a penalty charge notice can only be given by councils/police. They may have other names for the initials though.
2) any alledged debt/contract can only be with the driver and the RK cannot be forced to reveal who that is. eg We drive a corsa and any of 4 drivers are allowed to use it.
3) Ignore and do not admit who the driver was on any forum, the PPC mobs all look on them for easy pickings.
4) Any loss to the car park owner is a percentage of the 3 free hours. The cost of 3 hours is nil, 16 minutes is also nil. So any contract is for nil, so you owe them nothing.I'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.0 -
Personally I would not contact a Private Parking Company (unless I was issuing court papers on them).0
-
Yes - These guys are chancers. Simply file the threatening letters for future evidence till they give up.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards