We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
VAT on School uniform?
Options

portlandboy
Posts: 297 Forumite


in Cutting tax
Hi,
Can anyone tell me why my local "National Schoolwear" shop charged VAT on some of the uniform? I bought a blazer for my eldest son that had VAT on but the one for my younger son did not.
Both of the blazers had the school logo on and were smaller than the 43" maximum measurement stated on the HMRC website, but the shop owner tells me he must charge VAT because the school caters for children both under and over 14 years of age.
I think he may be quoting this rule from the HMRC website but I think he may have misunderstood the meaning:
6.1 What about school uniforms?
There is no specific relief for items of school uniform, they are subject to the normal rules for children’s clothes.
However, if you supply garments under a specific agreement with a school catering exclusively for pupils under 14 years of age you may be able to apply the zero-rate beyond the garment measurements in paragraph 4.2.
The garments must be unique to that school by design, such as a prominent badge or piping in school colours, and held out for sale as being for that school only. If these conditions are met, you may apply the zero-rate irrespective of garment size.
The same principles apply to clothing items which form the uniform of other youth organisations catering exclusively for the under 14s, such as Beavers and Brownies.
Any views please?
Can anyone tell me why my local "National Schoolwear" shop charged VAT on some of the uniform? I bought a blazer for my eldest son that had VAT on but the one for my younger son did not.
Both of the blazers had the school logo on and were smaller than the 43" maximum measurement stated on the HMRC website, but the shop owner tells me he must charge VAT because the school caters for children both under and over 14 years of age.
I think he may be quoting this rule from the HMRC website but I think he may have misunderstood the meaning:
6.1 What about school uniforms?
There is no specific relief for items of school uniform, they are subject to the normal rules for children’s clothes.
However, if you supply garments under a specific agreement with a school catering exclusively for pupils under 14 years of age you may be able to apply the zero-rate beyond the garment measurements in paragraph 4.2.
The garments must be unique to that school by design, such as a prominent badge or piping in school colours, and held out for sale as being for that school only. If these conditions are met, you may apply the zero-rate irrespective of garment size.
The same principles apply to clothing items which form the uniform of other youth organisations catering exclusively for the under 14s, such as Beavers and Brownies.
Any views please?

Note to Self: When posting, remember to keep within "forum rules" to avoid upsetting other "interested parties"
0
Comments
-
If I understand you correctly you are saying that you believe both blazers should qualify for zero rating.
I read that section to only apply to items which are in excess of the maximum measurements allowed. Then, if the additional conditions are met (which they wont be in your case), zero rating can still apply.
Any help?If it’s not important to you, don’t consume it0 -
Hi Elaine,
You are correct that the section I quoted refers to school items over the maximum size limits. but childrens' clothing items undersize are VAT free any way (see below). The blazers are 36" & 41" with the maximum permitted VAT free size of boys jackets/waistcoats being 43". I don't understand why only one blazer was VAT free. Surely he wouldn't have to buy some in with VAT on and some without, as they are all undersize and clearly schoolwear, would he?
4.2 Clothing
We will accept that garments are designed for young children provided they are at or within the tabled measurements below. These measurements are based on children up to the eve of their 14th birthday, as this is when the body dimensions begin to merge with those of the general adult population.
The garments should be measured on a flat surface, with creases smoothed out, buttons (or equivalent) fastened and any intended overlap in place. Chest measurements should normally be taken 2.5 cms (1”) below the base of the armhole and multiplied by two. Similarly, waist measurements should be taken from one side of the fastened waistband to the other and multiplied by two.
Boys
Garment
Chest
Waist
Shirts
104cms
41’’
Knitwear
104cms
41’’
Jackets, waistcoats
109cms
43’’
Top coats, outerwear
114cms
44.5’’
Dresses
Skirts*
Trousers, shorts*
72cms
28.5’’
Underwear, swimwear
88cms
34.5’’
72cms
28.5’’
Nightwear
105cms
41.5’’
73cms
29’’Note to Self: When posting, remember to keep within "forum rules" to avoid upsetting other "interested parties"0 -
I agree with you. Section 6.1 is irrelevant. Section 4.2 covers your case and seems clear enough.
He may be thinking about the reasoning behind the figures. As you quoted, the idea is to treat 14 year olds as adult. But it is the garment that is taxed, not the wearer. So a small 15 year old could buy a zero rated blazer whereas a large 13 year old may not be able to.If it’s not important to you, don’t consume it0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards