We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

STAY applied to Credit Card claim - how can this be?

Stay applied to Credit Card claim - how can this be? Hi,

I put a moneyclaim in vs Virgin cc and this was defended. The judgment has been made and a stay has been put in place. How can this be for Credit cards and how do I apply to have the stay lifted? Thank you!
"onwards & upwards"

Comments

  • natweststaffmember
    natweststaffmember Posts: 12,063 Forumite
    HAVEFAITH wrote: »
    Stay applied to Credit Card claim - how can this be? Hi,

    I put a moneyclaim in vs Virgin cc and this was defended. The judgment has been made and a stay has been put in place. How can this be for Credit cards and how do I apply to have the stay lifted? Thank you!
    I think you need to contact the court and ask them for advice. I would suggest a letter to the court that the stay has been granted in error as it is a credit card charges case.
    What was the POC?
    I have not worked for NatWest Bank since February 2009

    This username is no longer active.
  • HAVEFAITH
    HAVEFAITH Posts: 557 Forumite
    PPI Party Pooper
    I think you need to contact the court and ask them for advice. I would suggest a letter to the court that the stay has been granted in error as it is a credit card charges case.
    What was the POC?

    Not for credit cards
    "onwards & upwards"
  • HAVEFAITH
    HAVEFAITH Posts: 557 Forumite
    PPI Party Pooper
    I think you need to contact the court and ask them for advice. I would suggest a letter to the court that the stay has been granted in error as it is a credit card charges case.
    What was the POC?

    ok thank you ... sorry excuse my igonarance, what's POC?
    "onwards & upwards"
  • Orford
    Orford Posts: 2,199 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    HAVEFAITH wrote: »
    what's POC?
    Particulars of Claim
  • esmerellda
    esmerellda Posts: 2,237 Forumite
    Something like this to court

    Dear Sir

    I write to confirm the receipt of your order for my claim number XXXXXX.

    I note that the order is for my claim to be stayed pending the ultimate determination of the Court Litigation, brought by the Office of Fair Trading, relating to the matter of the application of the law in respect of unauthorised overdraft charges on BANK current accounts .

    I wish to make the court aware that my claim does not relate in any way to unauthorised charges on a current bank account. It is a claim for the return of disproportionate charges levied for defaults on a credit card.

    The OFT has previously investigated the level of charges levied in respect of credit cards (April 2006) and in view of this report, credit card claims are not included in the current test case proceedings OFT V Abbey national & Ors.

    Following this report, default charges have been broadly reduced to around £12. However, I still believe these charges to be punitive in nature and not a genuine pre-estimate of cost incurred by the credit card company. I believe they exceed any alleged actual loss in respect of any breaches of contract on my part and are not intended to represent or relateto any alleged actual loss, but instead unduly enrich the credit card companies which exercises the contractual term in respect of such charges with a view to profit.

    In order to amount to lawful liquidated damages it has to be shown that the charges applied represent a genuine pre-estimate of losses (per Lord Dunedin Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage and Motor Co Ltd [1915] AC 79).

    I therefore respectfully request that the ordered stay on my claim number xxxxxxx be lifted and my case allowed to proceed without delay or reference to the pending test case .

    I thank the court for its time and consideration in reviewing this matter and hope this clarifies the particulars of my claim.



    Yours faithfully



    Edit to suit :) (BIT OF AN OLD LETTER SORRY)
    LegalBeagles
  • HAVEFAITH
    HAVEFAITH Posts: 557 Forumite
    PPI Party Pooper
    esmerellda wrote: »
    Something like this to court

    Dear Sir

    I write to confirm the receipt of your order for my claim number XXXXXX.

    I note that the order is for my claim to be stayed pending the ultimate determination of the Court Litigation, brought by the Office of Fair Trading, relating to the matter of the application of the law in respect of unauthorised overdraft charges on BANK current accounts .

    I wish to make the court aware that my claim does not relate in any way to unauthorised charges on a current bank account. It is a claim for the return of disproportionate charges levied for defaults on a credit card.

    The OFT has previously investigated the level of charges levied in respect of credit cards (April 2006) and in view of this report, credit card claims are not included in the current test case proceedings OFT V Abbey national & Ors.

    Following this report, default charges have been broadly reduced to around £12. However, I still believe these charges to be punitive in nature and not a genuine pre-estimate of cost incurred by the credit card company. I believe they exceed any alleged actual loss in respect of any breaches of contract on my part and are not intended to represent or relateto any alleged actual loss, but instead unduly enrich the credit card companies which exercises the contractual term in respect of such charges with a view to profit.

    In order to amount to lawful liquidated damages it has to be shown that the charges applied represent a genuine pre-estimate of losses (per Lord Dunedin Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage and Motor Co Ltd [1915] AC 79).

    I therefore respectfully request that the ordered stay on my claim number xxxxxxx be lifted and my case allowed to proceed without delay or reference to the pending test case .

    I thank the court for its time and consideration in reviewing this matter and hope this clarifies the particulars of my claim.



    Yours faithfully



    Edit to suit :) (BIT OF AN OLD LETTER SORRY)

    That's excellent, thank you very much!
    "onwards & upwards"
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.