truley sickened

Cherryscone

I Have had an ongoing case with the csa for over 12 years theres over thirteen thousand owing my son is now 20 and last week left college and signed on ,my case has been with enforcememnt been at court more times than enough absent father received a large compensation payout still didnt settle up ,i rang and csa said case is closed there not doing no more i am so upset why due to the csa mucking about for 12 years and not doing their job should my child and i lose out :mad:

Loopy_Girl

Did you ask why they had closed the case?

Cherryscone

they said because a lot of arrears were pre 2000 and my son was now 20 ,it annoys me because they had absent father at court told him to pay he didnt they lot it go then back to court then he said he had no job then he mived out of uk 12 years wasted

DUTR

madmam wrote: »

they said because a lot of arrears were pre 2000 and my son was now 20 ,it annoys me because they had absent father at court told him to pay he didnt they lot it go then back to court then he said he had no job then he mived out of uk 12 years wasted

Sorry that you are upset and feel you have wasted 12yrs, I'm not sure if the original post and the further reply is a wind up.
If the guy turned up to court and was not working , then at that time none or minimal child support is due.There maybe more to the episode than we know or need to know, as I suspect the agency would pursue the claim if they thought it would be valid and succesful

kelloggs36

If the NRP works for a company ie is not self employed, then they can still collect the debt via a DEO - they don't need a court order. Was he self employed?

Cherryscone

he worked they collected the money from his wages then he went self employed they started over agin so when he was aked to pay again he went on job seekers when a new assesment was then made which said he hadnt anything to pay he went back to work csa then caught up again so he moved to france this is the way it has went on round and around in circles when they called at his address they said he wasnt living there now hes been self employed for about 5 years or more

Cherryscone

DUTR wrote: »

Sorry that you are upset and feel you have wasted 12yrs, I'm not sure if the original post and the further reply is a wind up.
If the guy turned up to court and was not working , then at that time none or minimal child support is due.There maybe more to the episode than we know or need to know, as I suspect the agency would pursue the claim if they thought it would be valid and succesful

sorry i dont know what you think is a wind up please explain?

DUTR

madmam wrote: »

sorry i dont know what you think is a wind up please explain?

As said in the earlier reply There maybe more to the episode than we know or need to know, as I suspect the agency would pursue the claim if they thought it would be valid and succesful . , if it was so easy to avoid paying, there would be many many more NRPs avoiding paying there dues. I suspect France and many Western European EU countries have a REMO agreement, so the NRP moving to France would have little effect on his responsibilities. Obviously if it is not a wind up then I stand corrected, I won't just beleive any and everything that is written without question.

kelloggs36

DUTR wrote: »

As said in the earlier reply There maybe more to the episode than we know or need to know, as I suspect the agency would pursue the claim if they thought it would be valid and succesful . , if it was so easy to avoid paying, there would be many many more NRPs avoiding paying there dues.Oh I can assure you there are plenty!!!!!I suspect France and many Western European EU countries have a REMO agreement, so the NRP moving to France would have little effect on his responsibilities. Obviously if it is not a wind up then I stand corrected, I won't just beleive any and everything that is written without question.

..........................................................................................................................

DUTR

kelloggs36 wrote: »

..........................................................................................................................

I'm sure there are plenty, I must be too honest , if after the CSA start a certain level of sanctions I can just turn up at court and claim I'm not working and the prosecution just accept my word seems all too easy, now I feel like I'm missing out :eek:, I always fancied life in Dusseldorf, however I don't think an escape out of contribution is that straight forward, I can sign up to time off work and reduce my pay to 25% of what it is, I doubt my csa payments would be re-assesed to reflect the new circumstance :mad:

kelloggs36

The problem really lies with the CSA believing all the lies that are spouted by those who choose to do so. That is what lets off all the self employed ones who choose not to pay.