We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Going knock for knock?

Options
2»

Comments

  • welshmoneylover
    welshmoneylover Posts: 3,324 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Thank you for your comments and opinions,
    Be happy, it's the greatest wealth :)
  • On what basis are the third party insurers attaching some liability to the male driver - have they detailed this? Was the male driver passing parked vehicles on his side of the road perhaps? Often, bearing in mind the damage to the male drivers vehicle, insurers would use the argument that he could not have moved sideways in to her vehicle indicating she drove into him and not vice versa.
  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,077 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Welcome back LadyIndecisive :T

    I was going to mention whether the damage indicated anything objective.
    However the problem is that she/they (the other insurer) can simply deny the scenrio e.g. passing parked cars, as there are no witnesses to say otherwise.
    Of course they might commit themselves to a scenrio and then tie themselves up in knots which proves they are lying.

    So I guess the answer is to press the insurer to see if the stories add up.
    They might just be going knock-for-knock straight away without putting in any effort as that costs them less. Sometimes you do have to dig your heels in and stand up for yourself. (But they still wouldn't fight it in court unless there are any massive holes in her story).
  • Thanks lisyloo :D

    It's important to know what the allegations are in order to make proper counter arguments. Sounds like there's possibly more to this. Insurers won't generally waste time & money arguing black is white; the old rules of liability are there to save this effort. If this is a simple case of a vehicle emerging from a parked position into the path of the correctly proceeding vehicle established on the main road it is quite clear cut. However, proceeding correctly at a legal speed doesn't totally exonerate one from paying heed to other road users unfortunately.

    The 'quick enough to take your money' comment made me smile OP. I worked in claims for many years and if I had a £1 for each time I heard this I would no longer need to work in insurance. ;)
  • Hi, the male driver wasn't over taking any parked cars. He was driving in a straight manner down the street and not speeding.

    I think I am going to advise him to dig his heels in!
    Be happy, it's the greatest wealth :)
  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,077 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I think that's the correct approach as a lot of companies are quick to fob you off these days (or seek the most cost effective route).

    However don't expect a lie detectetor expert and team of forensic collision investigators to be employed.
    It doesn't make sense to spend thousands of pounds allocating blame when the costs are in hundreds.
    Despite the unfairness of this, it's where the "knock-for-knock" system comes from and ultimately keeps premiums low for you (and him).
    I'm sure you wouldn't want to pay double or triple your premium to have every case investigated by forensic experts in the name of fairness.

    Sorry, but however unsatisfactory that is, I'm sure that you can see the logic.
  • Oh well, it looks like it is going to be settled in court.

    Can anyone give me some of their experiences of going to court so we can be prepared for anything!

    Ta x
    Be happy, it's the greatest wealth :)
  • Just an update, the male driver has won his case! He is very pleased he held out and stood his ground, it just goes to show if you believe you are in the right then you must stick up for yourself!
    Be happy, it's the greatest wealth :)
  • mattymoo
    mattymoo Posts: 2,417 Forumite
    Was it you?
    Was the action heard under the small claims procedure?
    If so, why do you think you won? Was it down to quality of the evidence or did the other side fold before trial?
    Good result anyway - well done.
  • It was down to me as I wrote his replies in an academic legal type way and yes, the other side folded in the end.

    I feel rather pleased with myself.
    Be happy, it's the greatest wealth :)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.