We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Section 75 for Michael Jackson concert?
Comments
-
Well in the light of the fact that the OP was clearly a fan by means of having tickets - why not write the money off as a gesture of good will?never-in-doubt wrote: »fair point, I think the original question was valid but then we all started to get carried away! Shall I start a Jade thread - lolSince when has the world of computer software design been about what people want? This is a simple question of evolution. The day is quickly coming when every knee will bow down to a silicon fist, and you will all beg your binary gods for mercy.0 -
Yes send it to michaels recievers for his previous debt0
-
Well in the light of the fact that the OP was clearly a fan by means of having tickets - why not write the money off as a gesture of good will?
Well that is like suggesting everyone sends a nice cheque to AEG
Much as he had the biggest recording contract EVER, he still managed to rack up debts of around $400m!0 -
Yea well, he would have fit in very well on this site then.Well that is like suggesting everyone sends a nice cheque to AEG
Much as he had the biggest recording contract EVER, he still managed to rack up debts of around $400m!Since when has the world of computer software design been about what people want? This is a simple question of evolution. The day is quickly coming when every knee will bow down to a silicon fist, and you will all beg your binary gods for mercy.0 -
never-in-doubt wrote: »But to be fair with all the coverage (24hrs non stop on sky news) it does become a little tedious, he was only a singer after all - not like the Queen Mother or Princess Di now is it?
Well, no - he had talent, they were famous for marrying royalty.0 -
never-in-doubt wrote: »But to be fair with all the coverage (24hrs non stop on sky news) it does become a little tedious, he was only a singer after all - not like the Queen Mother or Princess Di now is it?
Now I'm not bothered by MJ's death, not even a fan. But if you asked me which out of those three I want to mourn over, I think I know which two I wouldn't pick.0 -
-
-
-
I thought this thread was about Section 75 for Michael Jackson concert?

Born and bred in Manchester (proud of it)
Now living on the other side of the Pennines0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards