Mitsubishi Colt - faulty glovebox

ChrisH
ChrisH Posts: 40 Forumite
Hi guys,

Hope you can help me with this one!

In December 2008, I purchased a second-hand Mitsubishi Colt (2005 model) and the glovebox has recently developed a fault, whereby the catch sticks and the glovebox can therefore not be closed.

Upon Googling the issue, it would appear that this was a common problem and a new revised glovebox was made available free of charge to those requesting replacements under warranty.

I contacted Mitsubishi who advised that as the car is out of warranty, it will cost me £116.00 + VAT :eek: for a replacement.

I'm just wondering if it would be worth pursuing Mitsubishi under the Sale of Goods Act for a free of charge replacement as the original glovebox was not fit for purpose (as shown by many buyer's guides online, forum posts and the revised one fitted to replace the original faulty ones).

Do any of you have any thoughts? I know I probably won't have much luck, but just can't justify spending that amount of money for a manufacturing defect! As the car is relatively new, I haven't been able to find any of the newer, revised gloveboxes on eBay or at a local breaker's yard.

Thanks for any thoughts/suggestions you can give. :beer:

Chris

Comments

  • Bowdyjan18
    Bowdyjan18 Posts: 316 Forumite
    Phone them direct and play hell :D
  • Chippy_Minton_2
    Chippy_Minton_2 Posts: 1,839 Forumite
    The car is four years old and out of warranty. The last owner should have had it replaced for free but didn't. There seems to be very little point in you taking this any further with Mitsubishi. Who did you buy the car off?
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • ChrisH
    ChrisH Posts: 40 Forumite
    Hi,

    The glovebox wasn't a recall item, so the previous owner wouldn't have had it replaced as the fault has only recently occurred.

    I bought the car from a Ford dealership in Newbury.

    I appreciate your point, but does the Sale of Goods Act not protect consumers for up to six years from the original purchase date?

    Thanks for your reply :cool:
  • goldspanners
    goldspanners Posts: 5,910 Forumite
    ChrisH wrote: »
    Hi,

    The glovebox wasn't a recall item, so the previous owner wouldn't have had it replaced as the fault has only recently occurred.

    I bought the car from a Ford dealership in Newbury.

    I appreciate your point, but does the Sale of Goods Act not protect consumers for up to six years from the original purchase date?

    Thanks for your reply :cool:

    you didnt buy it from mitsubishi or even a mitsubishi dealer new though did you?
    you bought it from a ford dealer second hand so the sale of goods act contract you have is with them, not mitsubishi or any of thier dealers.

    however, it is worth calling a mitsubishi dealer asking if they would replace it as it is apparently a known fault. other than this find one being broken in a scrap yard or on ebay and buy the part yourself, this happens in life things break
    ...work permit granted!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 243K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 597.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.5K Life & Family
  • 256K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.