We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
10 yrs on will u be envious of all those 'muppets' that got into B2L now?
Comments
-
Seems a good idea for future ex-BTL surplus to become social housing then!
Looks nailed on to be honest, I really don't understand why people bought some of these these places. A number of these blocks are edging onto some very deprived areas e.g. Cheetham Hill in Manchester, now you wouldn't wish to pay £250k for a nice exec flat in Dodge City would you? The facts haven't changed, it was obvious 2 years back.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
you're probably right - but when i say tax efficient it's all above board.
there are plenty out there that don't declare their earnings especially with accidental landlords.
They should be declaring their tax losses, to put against future year profits.I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.0 -
Agree, annuities are totally rubbish and the returns are totally duff.0
-
Chucky's been posting this same stupid graph for the last 3 weeks now. I don't know why though, he doesn't have a clue what it means. He must think it looks good or something.0 -
FoxtonsRIP wrote: »Chucky's been posting this same stupid graph for the last 3 weeks now. I don't know why though, he doesn't have a clue what it means. He must think it looks good or something.
Seems pretty clear to me.0 -
FoxtonsRIP wrote: »Chucky's been posting this same stupid graph for the last 3 weeks now. I don't know why though, he doesn't have a clue what it means. He must think it looks good or something.
seemed pretty clear to me - you obviously don't understand it because you've not commented anything positive or negative about it just tried another weak snipe.
come on Downey is that best that you can do?0 -
I think it would be great if the following graph was updated
My point is though, where do people see this being represented in the coming few decades.
We have started to see a decline in Owner Occupied and also in social rented.
Will society become dependant on the private rented properties.
It certainly seemed it was so a decade ago.:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
Not at all. I don't want to be a LL, and I don't do envy....much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.0
-
???????neverdespairgirl wrote: »Not at all. I don't want to be a LL, and I don't do envy.
Not sure what your responding to:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »???????
Not sure what your responding to
The original post - will I be envious in 10 years' time...much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards