We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Lloyds Monthly Saver now up to 5%
Comments
-
I've just had my first deposit paid into my account. I've now changed the payment date to the 1st. There seem to be two reasons for doing this.
1 - I'll have £500 in the account right at the start. This money will get the 5% for the full 12 months.
2 - I'll get 13 deposit into the account within the 12 months, although the last payment will be in the account for less than a month.0 -
The account just appeared with its first monthly SO paid in to-day.
Changed to 1st June now.Dagobert0 -
Pay in the maximum of £250 per month and you earn £68 interest net. This is 5% gross but I have money in West Bromwich earning 4.3% so this extra account would net me about £1 per month extra.
I know you should look after the pennies and I'm as keen to do that as most but, is it worth the time involved?
Please someone - convince me!
GGThere are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those that don't.0 -
As a "proper" investor, GG, your time is far too valuable to waste on a thread like this!
Update
My mum called Lloyds after 6.00pm on Thursday. The Regular Savings account, first payment and s/o were all completed by 12.00 noon Friday.0 -
Please someone - convince me!
not sure if this is convincing, but with 13 payments, and the first going in on the 28th - I make it £73.75 net
no trouble to setup and run - I much rather I had the extra interest rather than Lloyds0 -
Gorgeous_George wrote: »Pay in the maximum of £250 per month and you earn £68 interest net. This is 5% gross but I have money in West Bromwich earning 4.3% so this extra account would net me about £1 per month extra.
I know you should look after the pennies and I'm as keen to do that as most but, is it worth the time involved?
Please someone - convince me!
GG
I have my own rule of thumb for how much I'd need to gain for it to be worth opening and monitoring one more account, personally I wouldn't bother for about £1 a month but you may feel differently.0 -
mines showing online now so all fine, looks like they set up standing order for 30.5.09?? given thats saturday, doubt it will be taken then, so have switched it to 2.6.09 (tuesday)MFW#105 - 2015 Overpaid £8095 / 2016 Overpaid £6983.24 / 2017 Overpaid £3583.12 / 2018 Overpaid £2583.12 / 2019 Overpaid £2583.12 / 2020 Overpaid £2583.12/ 2021 overpaid £1506.82 /2022 Overpaid £2975.28 / 2023 Overpaid £2677.30 / 2024 Overpaid £2173.61 Total OP since mortgage started in 2015 = £37,286.86 2025 MFW target £1700, payments to date at April 2025 - £1712.07..0
-
Gorgeous_George wrote: »Pay in the maximum of £250 per month and you earn £68 interest net. This is 5% gross but I have money in West Bromwich earning 4.3% so this extra account would net me about £1 per month extra.
I know you should look after the pennies and I'm as keen to do that as most but, is it worth the time involved?
Please someone - convince me!
GG
I'm not trying to convince you of anything but you are not comparing like for like.
I guess the Bromwich account was the e-bond ( no longer available) that doesn't allow withdrawals or extra deposits?
If you have a lump sum and a drip feed account paying 2% say, the overall gross interest on £3250 ( if open close to month end) is approx £ 120 or 3.7%.
If you can beat 3.7% or don't fancy the hassle then don't bother with it.0 -
sloughflint wrote: »I'm not trying to convince you of anything but you are not comparing like for like.
I guess the Bromwich account was the e-bond ( no longer available) that doesn't allow withdrawals or extra deposits?
If you have a lump sum and a drip feed account paying 2% say, the overall gross interest on £3250 ( if open close to month end) is approx £ 120 or 3.7%.
If you can beat 3.7% or don't fancy the hassle then don't bother with it.
he has a fair point - the marginal benefit of putting £3000 over the year at 5% compared with 4.3% is about £90 -
he has a fair point - the marginal benefit of putting £3000 over the year at 5% compared with 4.3% is about £9
Not really. This LTSB product doesn't allow a lump sum deposit of 3k and the 4.3% account no longer exists so not an option for comparison purposes.
The poster is either considering putting in new monthly money at 5% or using a readily available lump sum.
If the latter, s/he needs to decide what is currently best available at the moment for lump sums. If 3.7% can be beaten ( see below) then not to bother.
One option might be to find an extra 2k from somewhere and use the LTSB current account @4% for flexibility or less flexible with a 2k minimum:
http://www.stroudandswindon.co.uk/internet_savings_bond7.aspx0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards