We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Parking fine at University

24

Comments

  • is this likely to bring any ramafications, if so what and is it worth the £30 they want me to pay now?
  • Horace
    Horace Posts: 14,426 Forumite
    If its the University of Birmingham then they have very stringent rules about who uses their carparks - some of them are pay and display but you need to use an ID card to swipe in and out. You would need to display some kind of permit on your car as well - these are colour coded according to what type of parking you are entitled to use.

    At the University of Birmingham, they will clamp you as well and should have their byelaws clearly noted - they usually do their best to comply with the law. BTW the Security Officers at the University of Birmingham do hold the correct licence for clamping and ticketting.
  • adouglasmhor
    adouglasmhor Posts: 15,554 Forumite
    Photogenic
    Coupon-mad wrote: »
    Surely they couldn't do that if no-one has said who the driver was?

    Ignore it OP, certainly don't admit to anyone who the driver was on the day. They can't enforce anything against the registered keeper if they cannot prove he/she was the driver - with whom they might otherwise argue they had some sort of dodgy contract.

    People only pay these 'fines' because they don't know they don't have to.

    That's why I said be careful what info you give them, they did it to a guy at Glasgow uni who had been parking for years, he ended up shelling out a small fortune. Anyway as OP is not at that uni no proplem there.
    The truth may be out there, but the lies are inside your head. Terry Pratchett


    http.thisisnotalink.cöm
  • oldone_2
    oldone_2 Posts: 974 Forumite
    poet123 wrote: »
    So, are no private companies able to legally enforce parking restrictions on privately owned land?

    I work at a college and we (students and staff ) pay an annual fee(different amounts) to park. We also have the fines dished out for not having the permit, and for not being "properly parked" in the designated bays.

    Are both these "infringements" not legally enforcable by the college or their agents? If so, why do people pay them? as I know they have done? and why does an employer put up legally unenforcable notices? It makes them look stupid imo.

    Of course your college can legally enforce parking on its land - what it can't do is is charge infringements at such a high rate it becomes a penalty.A court of law would take a very dim view of this, since only they can impose fines and penalties.

    Look at it this way.If your permit costs £350 a year, that is a pound a day.If you parked for a day without showing your permit, the college are entitled to claim a £1, what they can't do is 'fine' you £50 or £60. In this scenario, as you have a permit, the college has made no loss, so cannot even justify the pound charge.
  • no its not birmingham university and there is nothing stated on the ticket about any laws or anything, its on university headed paper and the only thing it really has thats anywhere near official is about getting details from the dvla and that its the security officer that deals with it. this is why i doubted its legitimacy from the start.
  • sarahg1969
    sarahg1969 Posts: 6,694 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Perhaps they should have consulted someone in their law department befure issuing Fixed Penalty Notices?
  • sarahg1969 wrote: »
    Perhaps they should have consulted someone in their law department befure issuing Fixed Penalty Notices?

    is this actually a legal thing? i didnt even think of it as being legal terminology only usable by police, just that its a fixed penalty that they are notifying me of
  • pogofish
    pogofish Posts: 10,853 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If you do not pay the fines, some universities have been known to stop you from graduating. So be careful what info you give them.

    This will not happen here
  • Coblcris
    Coblcris Posts: 1,862 Forumite
    Horace wrote: »
    If its the University of Birmingham then they have very stringent rules about who uses their carparks - some of them are pay and display but you need to use an ID card to swipe in and out. You would need to display some kind of permit on your car as well - these are colour coded according to what type of parking you are entitled to use.

    At the University of Birmingham, they will clamp you as well and should have their byelaws clearly noted - they usually do their best to comply with the law. BTW the Security Officers at the University of Birmingham do hold the correct licence for clamping and ticketting.

    University Byelaws ? ? ?

    How on earth does a University have statutory authority to create byelaws ? ? ?

    And just what is this 'licence for ticketing' ? ?

    Horace, I fear you are not helping.


    to the OP, just ignore the PPC. they just send letters..
  • pogofish
    pogofish Posts: 10,853 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    no its not birmingham university and there is nothing stated on the ticket about any laws or anything, its on university headed paper and the only thing it really has thats anywhere near official is about getting details from the dvla and that its the security officer that deals with it. this is why i doubted its legitimacy from the start.

    Crikey! :D

    If you get any comeback at all, don't waste your time writing to them.

    Just go straight to the Principal with this:
    The Administration of Justice Act 1970.

    Section 40 of the act provides that a person commits an offence if, with the object of coercing another person to pay money claimed from the other as a debt due under contract, he or she:
    harasses the other with demands for payment which by their frequency, or the manner or occasion of their making, or any accompanying threat or publicity are calculated to subject him or his family or household to alarm, distress or humiliation;
    falsely represents, in relation to the money claimed, that criminal proceedings lie for failure to pay it;
    falsely represent themselves to be authorised in some official capacity to claim or enforce payment;
    utters a document falsely represented by him to have some official character or purporting to have some official character which he knows it has not.

    Or the Police as it is now a criminal matter

    The security officer's !!!! won't touch the ground! :)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 247K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.