We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Going to have to leave my flat
Comments
-
There is a shortage of social housing, so its obvious that it has to be allocated on priority need but there is nothing to stop you using your local housing allowance to get a studio/bedsit within the private sector.
As a single childless male the world is your oyster - you could maybe have a look at jobs with live-in accommodation?0 -
Oldernotwiser wrote: »Why on earth should any system supply subsidised housing for a healthy single male of 31?
For the same reasons everyone else is considered for susidised housing.
Are you discriminating between genders? age? marital status???0 -
phil1873football wrote: »For the same reasons everyone else is considered for susidised housing.
Are you discriminating between genders? age? marital status???
Or a single healthy female either.
Social housing these days is normally for people with some special requirements, not just for those who want to live somewhere cheap!0 -
My son, who is single and 29, was told that he would stand NO chance of ever getting Council Housing on his own, and virtually none if he applied with his girlfriend unless one or both of them had a disability that meant they had special housing needs, or children.
So that's it, I wouldn't count on Council Housing if I were you.
Advertise on spareroom as someone has suggested, or on www.easyroommate.com
I have advertised twice on the above site and have got a lodger easily each time, the second time the young man who eventually had the room answered within minutes. There is a fee, I think it's about £20.
Or as someone else has suggested, move into an exisrting house-share.(AKA HRH_MUngo)
Member #10 of £2 savers club
Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton0 -
There are couples with children who cant get a council place.0
-
Where abouts are you? My guess is it is easier to find shrers in some places thn others.
Also re housing benefit for privte rental, I don't know w this works, but can you apply for it for where you are cerrently renting? How much is the difference between what they will pay and the rent?0 -
Oldernotwiser wrote: »Or a single healthy female either.
Social housing these days is normally for people with some special requirements, not just for those who want to live somewhere cheap!
I appreciate where your coming from, however, there are lots of people who just can't afford to privately rent or get a mortgage, so social housing may be their last resort. On this basis, there should be NO discimination taking place be it, gender, age, number of children you have.etc.
Most of us pay taxes which contributes to these facilities, therefore, we should all be given a fair crack at the whip.0 -
I agree that having children should not necessarily make you a priority for Council Housing and neither should marital status.
I don't personally see why someone should only have the option of a house-share if they happen to be single.
However,it is to do with NEED, and quite often it is women with children who are vulnerable and these are always given priority in being allocated an ever decreasing resource over someone who has other options.
If a resource is scarce, priorities must be made.(AKA HRH_MUngo)
Member #10 of £2 savers club
Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton0 -
seven-day-weekend wrote: »...I don't personally see why someone should only have the option of a house-share if they happen to be single.0
-
I agree with other posters. Though you may see it as discrimination it is looked at on the circumstances of the individual involved and sex does come in to this in some circumstances as does children because of vunerability.
Is there nowhere you could afford to live? I'm just wondering if you've looked around for cheaper places you could afford or whether you've looked for a house share anywhere? Though no ideal it may be your only option.Never give up the dream! :beer:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards