We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Offer suitable altrenative employment?

I have just entered my consultation period having been identified at being at risk of redundancy.

I keep reading the term "your employer has a duty to offer you suitable alternative employment"

What does the term "offer" actually mean?

If an alternative exists can they "offer" it without the need for interview?

If there are a number of re-deployees, can the company offer an individual a specific job without interview or does it need to be made available for anybody to apply for?

Comments

  • Debt_Free_Chick
    Debt_Free_Chick Posts: 13,276 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    If there is a suitable alternative, they will normally tell you, ask you if you're interested and if you are, allow you to "have a trial" at that job for a while to see how you get on. If the job turns out not to be suitable, the redundancy then stands.

    Are there some specific circumstances you can share with us?
    Warning ..... I'm a peri-menopausal axe-wielding maniac ;)
  • There is a suitable alternative. There is another redeployee who would be suitable, so I guess this complicates things?

    I did however hear that another person NOT at risk of redundancy has applied for this position.

    Is this allowed or should the job be "ring fenced" for redeployees only?

    I found the following case (Ralph Martindale & Co. Ltd v Mr K Harris UKEAT/0166/07)

    Ruling stated:



    The new role was opened to the workforce by internal advertisement. We do not consider this to reflect the approach in current industrial relations practice of a reasonable employer. The following statement reflects the tribunals view as to current industrial relations practice in the absence of any particular circumstances suggesting a different course. If there was a question as to the capability of either person at risk of redundancy to undertake this role, then it should have been established that neither was suitable before opening the new role to further applicants.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.