We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The insanity of house buying
Comments
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucky
...those with a mortgage are BTL. it's quite simple really.
No.
I bought a second house around 8 years ago with the express intention of letting it; so, 'buy-to-let'. Right? But I bought it cash...[/QUOTE]
This is what I was referring to chucky. I didn't see the graphs, so maybe I missed the point. However, that is a clear statement which I am simply disagreeing with.Marching On Together
I've upped my standards...so up yours!
0 -
This is what I was referring to chucky. I didn't see the graphs, so maybe I missed the point. However, that is a clear statement which I am simply disagreeing with.
here you go - the blue line is private rentals.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/guides/456900/456991/html/default.stm0 -
Chucky points out that the number of privately rented houses hasn't gone up much up to 05 since the 90's crash. Yet anyone who has been around for the last year or two knows that the number of BTL mortgages has gone through the roof in the last few years, so where is the difference?
Has the traditional landlord been selling up and the newer BTL'rs been buying up at inflated prices?Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes.0 -
Lotus-eater wrote: »Chucky points out that the number of privately rented houses hasn't gone up much up to 05 since the 90's crash. Yet anyone who has been around for the last year or two knows that the number of BTL mortgages has gone through the roof in the last few years, so where is the difference?
Has the traditional landlord been selling up and the newer BTL'rs been buying up at inflated prices?
i don't people may have been selling up - but i do think there has been an inlux for 'speculators' or buyers without a plan that have excess cash to invest.0 -
I think many of those comenting on the virtues of BTL are not actually old enough to recall the changes to the market in 1996, and imagine that BTL as we have now is how it's always been.
It hasn't.
And before you ask - no, I never had a problem finding a suitable property to rent before 1996, or know anyone who did.
The difference then was that (a) there was far more council/social housing still available, so private renting really was a 'choice'. (b) house prices were far more affordable, so again, only those actively wanted to rent in preference to buying did so and (c) you didn't get all these greedy BTL idiots - you got professional landlords who'd actually put some thought into what they were doing.
Not claiming they were all angels - but you couldn't 'fall into' buying investment property then the way anyone could post 1996.
Also in Feb 1997 - ASTs became the normal tenancy prior to that tenants had far more security - all of a sudden it became 2 months notice making houses attractive liquidisable assets. Before this the property was the tenants home, older protected tenancies had rent control. When people moan about the UK property ownership expression and quote about Europeans being happy to rent - they usually forget it tends to be corporate (pension funds) in places like Germany/Switzerland who own and properly manage property and tenant protection and tenure is strong. The "flexibility" ASTs offer allowing people (Students/young people changing jobs) to move is difficult to find in these countries but if you are old/have kids/want to put down roots the stronger tenancies offer the opportunity.0 -
I don't want to live in a street with large numbers of BTLs, I don't want my neighbours daughter and boyfriend shacked up at home in their 30s scrimping for a deposit ot get somewhere permanent. I don't want the constant turnover of people on 6/12 month contracts. I'd like my neighbours to have sufficient confidence in being there beyond 2months to do little repairs and plant a few flowers in their garden. I don't want tenant's kids having to change schools and have their education mucked around with because of lack of stability - or to be forbidden from having pets or their parents redecorating their rooms. I don't want to spend hours trying to track down the BTL LL fence owner, persuading them to fix their storm damaged fence who has no interest in the area where I live. I don't want to pay taxes for the services and courts that have to clean up the mess of errant LLs or provide emergency services to support tenants being evicted from a repo... due to BTLers poor financial gamble.PasturesNew wrote: »Everybody wants to be "settled" at some point in their life. If you can't be sure where you'll be living this time next year then you stop making plans. You don't join groups, you don't get involved in the local community, you just stop doing things because you don't know if you'll be around.0 -
At the moment those of us approaching retirement are seeing our plans for a secure future fade rapidly. Investments and pensions have disappeared before our eyes, some of us have just put our earnings into the bank where its earning virtually zilch. These baby boomers will be the next people to look round for somewhere secure to put their money, rightly or wrongly, many will choose bricks and mortar.0
-
Idiot.skcollobcat10 wrote: »And as for you well if it is 80% of take home pay, well live with relatives.
0 -
skcollobcat10 wrote: »Anyway what is wrong with poorer people having to pay rent on a property that they cannot afford themselves.
Are you jealous of the landlord??
This is just life get over it!
Poor people don't rent, poor people live on benefits. You seem to be implying working class people in the UK shouldn't be able to afford a home as renting is pretty much the same cost as a mortgage on a house.skcollobcat10 wrote: »Know you mate, you need your head testing!!
People for generations, have rented houses/flats etc. There are always going to be peasants like yourself who require housing. Please do no pick on Buy to Let landlords otherwise you and your likes would be homeless!!
I'm not sure why you are calling people peasants but I guess this word gets branded around alot in Scotland
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards