We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
German 1Q GDP Posts Sharpest Fall Since 1970
Comments
-
Kinda. It was more that the Bundesbank was taking account of the impact of others' actions before acting itself.
I agree a little with the point, but I think this time they may just have found that final chamber in the game of Russian roulette.:eek:'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
I agree a little with the point, but I think this time they may just have found that final chamber in the game of Russian roulette.:eek:
My belief is that they never really addressed the Oste problem. They've just chucked money at it really. I think the idea at the last election was that Merkel would be a sort of cuddly Thatcher - tough in some vague undefined way but not getting rid of all that nice safety net stuff.0 -
It was more that the Bundesbank was taking account of the impact of others' actions before acting itself
Plus it was the only policy they had !!! :eek:
I remember Helmut Schlesinger saying, after weeks and weeks of expectant speculation in the markets, how he had 'summoned the courage' to cut the Discount rate by 1/4 % from about 7 1/2 %....he was worried because M3 was 'racing' away at 3%'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0 -
My belief is that they never really addressed the Oste problem. They've just chucked money at it really. I think the idea at the last election was that Merkel would be a sort of cuddly Thatcher - tough in some vague undefined way but not getting rid of all that nice safety net stuff.
Imagine what state the UK would be in, if 20 years ago, someone had said, you're doing so well we would like to give you another Northern Ireland, another Scotland, another Wales and Eighteen 'Derek Hatton era Merseysides' to look after.
* hides from inevitable Celtic backlash.
Yes, yes, we stole your oil
US housing: it's not a bubble
Moneyweek, December 20050 -
Comparing UK GDP to German GDP isn't a like-for-like barometer of the health of a nation's economy since government spending is part of GDP. The UK government has a larger deficit so this will increase GDP relative to the Germans. At a later date the UK government will have to repay this debt and this will then drag on economic growth.Rochdale_Pioneers wrote: »Which means what exactly?
Sticking to Germany this is hardly a fair comparison since they've had a very costly reunification in the past 20 years, excusing Britain's lavish borrowing because of the Berlin Wall falling down is silly.We started this with substantially less debt than our bigger competitors - we can run a bigger deficit for a while in order to leave recession quicker and STILL have less debt.
Agreed to an extent but tax receipts were artificially inflated thanks to the city of London so spending will have to fall in the long-term.The budget deficit is caused by tax receipts falling off, not spending.
That's 20,000 basis points.In the last recession borrowing increased 200 basis points (c35% of GDP to c55%)
"The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else." -- Frederic Bastiat, 1848.0 -
My belief is that they never really addressed the Oste problem
I think they were hoping that everyone else would help them 'pick up the tab' !!!'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards