We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a very Happy New Year. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Government fails to honour student loan promise
Comments
-
I can't say I am suprised by this but that doesnt make it right.
so sign the petition and kick up a fuss.
the squeeky wheel gets the oil!
if you dont ask for it you wont get it etc etc0 -
-
It's a very poorly written petition - the "more details" say:
"The current student loan interest rate is 1.5%, but it is meant to be linked to RPI inflation which is negative, it has gone down slowly from 4.50%, but stopped there, this petition is to show that students are not happy that it is not decreasing even though inflation is, it is meant to go up at the same rate that prices do, prices are decreasing, the loans should decrease."
This seems to have been written by someone who doesn't know how the interest rate is supposed to work.
It's tempting to start a better one.0 -
I was thinking that myself, if only to highlight the current issue - that they shouldn't stop the interest rate being linked to the RPI as it suits them.0
-
What about when RPI was 4.8% and the CPI was 3.1% (with the BoE target at 2.9%)? Applying the same logic you have used, surely the interest rate for student loans should have been less than the 4.8% it was back then as this would only make it "reasonable".As RPI inflation is down purely as a result of mortgage interest rates dropping and CPI is still significantly above the Bank of England target, this seems totally reasonable.
Targets are exactly that - a target. It does not represent the current climate. It is completely unreasonable for you to make a comparison and draw a conclusion based on how it relates to a target.0 -
anotherpaul wrote: »It's a very poorly written petition - the "more details" say:
"The current student loan interest rate is 1.5%, but it is meant to be linked to RPI inflation which is negative, it has gone down slowly from 4.50%, but stopped there, this petition is to show that students are not happy that it is not decreasing even though inflation is, it is meant to go up at the same rate that prices do, prices are decreasing, the loans should decrease."
This seems to have been written by someone who doesn't know how the interest rate is supposed to work.
It's tempting to start a better one.
Not only that, but someone with a poor grasp of English grammar and punctuation.
Normally, I don't care about people's spelling or grammar ability as long as I can understand what they're trying to say, but this was presumably started by someone who went to university. Christ all-bloody-mighty. Can't they at least make an effort to pretend that having a university education actually means anything these days?
I would have signed - although I have a pre-1998 loan, I don't like the precedent that this move sets - but I'm not even going to touch that petition with a sh**ty-stick.0 -
I've just seen this and it makes me very angry. I took out my loan on the basis that I would always pay back the same, in real terms, as I borrowed. That's not what's happened here. The government claims that "not increasing" the £15,000 repayment threshold makes this better but frankly that's ridiculous - trying to make a bad decision sound better by saying "we could have done something else" doesn't cut it.
I will be writing to my MP and I very strongly encourage everyone else to do the same thing.0 -
I've just seen this and it makes me very angry. I took out my loan on the basis that I would always pay back the same, in real terms, as I borrowed. That's not what's happened here. The government claims that "not increasing" the £15,000 repayment threshold makes this better but frankly that's ridiculous - trying to make a bad decision sound better by saying "we could have done something else" doesn't cut it.
I will be writing to my MP and I very strongly encourage everyone else to do the same thing.
as you took out your loan on the basis that you would always 'pay back the same' , presumably you will be repaying the tax payers as the March 2008 RPI was 3.8% but you are now only paying 1.5%.
or maybe not..0 -
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Loansofstudents/
This seems to be a better petition for those who want to sign.
(I've not signed either pertition, just posting the information)0 -
as you took out your loan on the basis that you would always 'pay back the same' , presumably you will be repaying the tax payers as the March 2008 RPI was 3.8% but you are now only paying 1.5%.
or maybe not..
That was a T&C already in the agreement and nothing that could be argued with; whereas the current situation is a different story.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.8K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 260K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards