We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Public sector/benefits to be savaged FT article

18910111214»

Comments

  • Wookster
    Wookster Posts: 3,795 Forumite
    ninky wrote: »
    hmmmmm. and you're saying that like it's a good thing?!

    If you read my posts, you'll see that my problem is not the welfare state itself, but that one can claim benefits indefinitely, without doing anything for the greater good of society/ the community.
  • Sponge
    Sponge Posts: 834 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    Oh and here is an article published today which shows just how much nonsense is spouted about the "poor" public sector.
    In today's Times results from a study by Price Waterhouse Coopers comparing the benefits of Public sector and private sector benefits since 1981.

    http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/columnists/article6296920.ece

    Where's the article? All I see is 3 paragraphs mentioning the comparison of 2 people. Hardly evidence of anything.
  • Old_Slaphead
    Old_Slaphead Posts: 2,749 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Ygor wrote: »
    Can't find the threads on the search. Can you post a link?


    From around posting number 30 onwards

    http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?t=1532547&page=3
  • Ygor
    Ygor Posts: 28 Forumite
    Thanks for that.
  • It is always about what is easiest.

    It is easiest not to chase after and punish scrotes with no money as one can't extract blood from a stone. Therefore they go after motorists and people who overfill bins instead.

    It is easiest to tell respectable Gurkas who will not complain to p*ss off out of the country than it is to fight those 'I know my rights and the system' economic migrants, so they get to stay and the Gurkas can sod off.

    It happens everywhere, in schools, in hospitals, with justice, taxes..... Why do any of us think that anything they do has any connection with justice or doing the right thing, because it does not. It is rewarding those whop should be being punished. And they wonder why so many of us are becoming alienated. But actually they don't even care about that either really. As the latest fiasco with MP expense claims has shown, even our leaders and representatives are just marking time trying to keep their snouts in the trough for as long as possible so they can retire rich. The British disease has reached the zenith; no-one cares, and the great unwashed have finally realised it.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.