We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
March Mortgage Approvals down 6.8% BBA says
Comments
-
Another graph, borrowed from another site, it does show how far things would have to go, just to get back to the average.
0 -
How about finding a graph that plots - House prices - Unemployment - Interest Rates.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0
-
Cannon_Fodder wrote: »
Quality homes does not mean very expensive homes, it means desirable to certain buyers.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
As everyone has a different opinion on what constitutes quality, I thought the top end would be more useful than sub-£50k properties...
There are thousands of properties out there, per major town.
Take your pick.0 -
kinda weird that a March is lower than a Feb for transactions in any year imo. not really feeling this is good for anyone tbh. if you in the rising camp transactions need to be rising esp at this time of year - if you are in the falling camp think transactions also need to rise from current levels or the falls won't really manifest themselves - you just have stasis.
I guess most would prefer wherever the bottom is to be reached quicker rather than slower seems the current policy of mitigating falls as much as possible will lead to a more protracted decline (tho it has to be said the monthly falls have been quite strong - stronger than the US as a whole, tho admittedly not nearly as strong as in the bubble states)Prefer girls to money0 -
I have seen an ever increasing number of properties for sale round Carlisle, lots sticking on the market and starting to see some nice reductions but still further to go I am sure.0
-
the_ash_and_the_oak wrote: »kinda weird that a March is lower than a Feb for transactions in any year imo. not really feeling this is good for anyone tbh. if you in the rising camp transactions need to be rising esp at this time of year - if you are in the falling camp think transactions also need to rise from current levels or the falls won't really manifest themselves - you just have stasis.
I guess most would prefer wherever the bottom is to be reached quicker rather than slower seems the current policy of mitigating falls as much as possible will lead to a more protracted decline (tho it has to be said the monthly falls have been quite strong - stronger than the US as a whole, tho admittedly not nearly as strong as in the bubble states)
Interesting point.
Would most people prefer quick falls? I know I would, but obviously I'm biased.
That said, a short sharp shock is surely better for the majority than a protracted decline, long-term unemployment etc etc.
Unfortunately, given that the entire govt policy is based entirely on sustaining a bubble of debt and floating the country, they daren't let it go down at all as it will become apparent that they were all swimming with no trousers on.
Fortunately, they can't hold back the waters any more than whichever famous personage it was who couldn't hold back the waters either (can't remember who it was. Anyone?).0 -
Not sure - problem with quicker falls is doesn't necessarily mean you get to the same point more quickly, can feed back into itself, more jobs being lost more quickly - sentiment taking a heavier battering (is actually not too bad atm!) - things could spiral more if this were to happen and end up worse than they would have been.
Think current policy is to make declines manageable. On the fence about this one tbh but don't think a more protracted and gradual decline is necessarily a bad thing per sePrefer girls to money0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards