Baumatic Cooker Hood Damaged - Advice Please

hollydays

phlogeston wrote: »

No, legally the onus is on the seller to deliver undamaged goods.

Somewhat irrelevant here,given the circumstances,burden of proof and all that.

We are discussing the buyers failure to spot damage during a 2 year period.Why should any supplier be expected to believe that?

Meepster

phlogeston wrote: »

Your post was rude and sarcastic, do not expect me to extend you any more respect than you deserve.

Rude? No - I was being clear and factual and I NEVER resorted to "name calling" :mad:

Sarcastic? Yes, most definately, it's the highest form of wit, you know? :rotfl:

OlliesDad

phlogeston wrote: »

I spout thing like this because I have a recent law degree and spent a year of my life studying contract law.

Maybe if you could get you head out of your a*rse you would know that there was nothing fundamentally wrong with the advice I gave.

I'm hoping you aren't planning on practising law as referring to the opposition as an a*rse will get you ridiculed by all your peers!

I am fairly sure you would need to keep your cool and prove your facts in a sensible manner!