We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
'Misleading' eBay prices ad banned
cally6008
Posts: 7,629 Forumite
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20090422/tuk-misleading-ebay-prices-ad-banned-6323e80.html
The advertising watchdog has banned eBay from boasting its prices are a quarter cheaper than those in high street shops.
Related photos / videos
The ASA has banned eBay from claiming it is a quarter cheaper than high street shops
A poster advertising the popular online marketplace read: "Guess what? 25% cheaper than the high street on brand new items."
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) upheld a complaint that the ad was misleading because it did not make the basis of the comparison - carried out for eBay by a third party company - clear enough.
eBay said that for each of 288 new products, the average price from recent eBay sales - including postal charges - were compared with an average of prices in stores such as Debenhams and John Lewis.
However readers, the ASA said, would take the poster to be an absolute claim that eBay was cheaper than all main high street stores for all new items, although there was not enough evidence to support this.
A spokesman said: "Because an average had been taken of all the stores' prices, it was possible that one store could have been regularly cheaper than eBay, or regularly much closer in price to eBay.
"Although it might be the case that eBay was cheaper than some high street stores for some new products, the evidence was not sufficient to support such an absolute claim that eBay was cheaper than all high street stores for all new products."
In addition, certain items such as furniture, garden goods, luggage, desktop computers and toys and games were not been included in the comparison, but the advert did not make that clear.
Although small print explained the basis of the ad's claim, the ASA said it was not big enough to avoid being overlooked and contradicted the main message of the headline.
The watchdog ruled that the ad was likely to mislead and must not appear again in its current form.
The advertising watchdog has banned eBay from boasting its prices are a quarter cheaper than those in high street shops.
Related photos / videos
The ASA has banned eBay from claiming it is a quarter cheaper than high street shopsA poster advertising the popular online marketplace read: "Guess what? 25% cheaper than the high street on brand new items."
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) upheld a complaint that the ad was misleading because it did not make the basis of the comparison - carried out for eBay by a third party company - clear enough.
eBay said that for each of 288 new products, the average price from recent eBay sales - including postal charges - were compared with an average of prices in stores such as Debenhams and John Lewis.
However readers, the ASA said, would take the poster to be an absolute claim that eBay was cheaper than all main high street stores for all new items, although there was not enough evidence to support this.
A spokesman said: "Because an average had been taken of all the stores' prices, it was possible that one store could have been regularly cheaper than eBay, or regularly much closer in price to eBay.
"Although it might be the case that eBay was cheaper than some high street stores for some new products, the evidence was not sufficient to support such an absolute claim that eBay was cheaper than all high street stores for all new products."
In addition, certain items such as furniture, garden goods, luggage, desktop computers and toys and games were not been included in the comparison, but the advert did not make that clear.
Although small print explained the basis of the ad's claim, the ASA said it was not big enough to avoid being overlooked and contradicted the main message of the headline.
The watchdog ruled that the ad was likely to mislead and must not appear again in its current form.
0
Comments
-
This was posted a short while earlier here, so rather than have two discussion threads I'll close this one now.
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?t=1641333I’m a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the eBay, Auctions, Car Boot & Jumble Sales, Boost Your Income, Praise, Vents & Warnings, Overseas Holidays & Travel Planning , UK Holidays, Days Out & Entertainments boards. If you need any help on these boards, do let me know.. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com.All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards