We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Which of these would return better mpg?

gaz_jones
gaz_jones Posts: 5,179 Forumite
Having an ongoing debate with a mate of mine.

WHich of these 2 scenarios would give you better mpg?


1) Driving in 4th gear and change up to fifth gear. fifth gear engages at 1500-2000 revs. The car doesn't have much pull in this rev range but it doesn't seem too unhappy to be driving at that lower rev range.

Or,

2) Driving in 4th gear and change up to fifth gear. Fifth gear engages at 2000-3000 revs. The car has pull from the second you put it into that gear.

Another way to put it would be:

1) Drive at 30 in 4th gear but engine wouldn't really pull the car if you had to put your foot down.

Or,

2) Driving in 3rd therefore having higher revs but car engine isn't struggling at all.


Both are the same question really just explained in a different way. Just incase my explanations aren't very good :rotfl:


Thanks everyone
This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.

Comments

  • anewman
    anewman Posts: 9,200 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 21 April 2009 at 4:05PM
    Try both and compare. I think number 1. If you need to put your foot down then drop down a gear.

    When I was taking lessons and about to do the test my instructor said it will be a minor fail point at some point in the future on a driving test to use too low a gear (termed something like economical driving).

    Some cars have a green zone on the rev counter on the dash showing the range through which the engine is supposed to be most efficient - and this info is sometimes in the owners manual.
  • gaz_jones
    gaz_jones Posts: 5,179 Forumite
    I wouldnt be able to test it as i'd have to drive on a whole tank just like that.

    I will have a look in the owners manual when i get back and see if they recommend a rev range.

    Any other views welcome :)
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  • Idiophreak
    Idiophreak Posts: 12,024 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I've done plenty of tests over full tanks of short-shifting vs normal driving - if you change up around 2000 revs you will save fuel - but you will, obviously, accelerate a lot more slowly.
  • It is completely dependant on the engine and car that you drive. Generally speaking i believe the advice for economical driving is you should always be in a gear that give you the lowest revs but where the engine will respond immediately. I.e. if you put your foot down the engine doesn't labour.

    In my car a 2.0 diesel this is about 1900rpm. For normal driving i would say i drive between 1900 and 2200 rpm. This gives me the best economy all you have to stir the gear box a bit.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.