We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
faulty carpet remnant refund query
Comments
-
I agree that SoGA has nothing to do with the manufacturer, and have said so on several occassions.
I am not wrong about the SoGA, I have given enough quotes from government sites, the contract is between the buyer an the seller, the buyer has no contract with the manufacturer, read again the quote from Consumer Direct in my post #18.
The buyer does not have a contract of sale with the manufacturer but may well have the guarantee contract or else rights under a collateral contract (Shankland Pier -v- Detel Products) or the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999.
I have used both principles several times in my professional life.0 -
-
phlogeston wrote: »Can we agree to agree on this one ?
:beer:
Absolutely! :T0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 247K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards